SKU: 68325283437

KW Gewindefahrwerk INOX V3 passend für Golf VII Variant / Leon ST 5F ohne DDC

Sale price$955.76 Regular price$1061.95
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $265.49 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 21 - Aug 26

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

KW Gewindefahrwerk INOX V3 passend für Golf VII Variant / Leon ST 5F ohne DDCKW V3 INOX Bitte entsprechende Achslast auswhlen! Fr Fahrzeuge mit: Klemmdurchmesser 50mm Verbundlenker Starrachse ohne elektrischer Dmpferregelung Tieferlegung VA HA (mm) 35 65 40 65 Unbegrenzte Individualitt fr Performance & Komfort. Dmpferkraftverstellung separat fr die Zug & Druckstufe. Wie bei jedem KW Gewindefahrwerk entwickeln unsere Fahrwerkingenieure auch fr die fahrzeugspezifischen Anwendungen des KW V3 eine sportlich harmonische

KW V3 INOX

- Bitte entsprechende Achslast auswählen!


Für Fahrzeuge mit:

-Klemmdurchmesser Ø50mm

-Verbundlenker/Starrachse

-ohne elektrischer Dämpferregelung

-Tieferlegung VA / HA (mm)     35-65 / 40-65



Unbegrenzte Individualität für Performance & Komfort. Dämpferkraftverstellung separat für die Zug- & Druckstufe.
Wie bei jedem KW Gewindefahrwerk entwickeln unsere Fahrwerkingenieure auch für die fahrzeugspezifischen Anwendungen des KW V3 eine sportlich-harmonische Grundabstimmung. Neben Tests auf unserem KW 7-post Fahrdynamikprüfstand absolvieren wir dazu ausgiebige Messfahrten auf Landstraßen, der Autobahn und selbst auf der Nürburgring Nordschleife Testkilometer für Testkilometer, um Ihnen die perfekte Fahrwerkabstimmung zu garantieren. Seit Jahren ist das weltweit zu den Top-Aftermarketprodukten zählende KW V3 die Referenz für Gewindefahrwerke. Mit seiner Dämpfercharakteristik, der hochwertigen Verarbeitung und der ausgezeichneten Langlebigkeit überzeugt es anspruchsvolle Sportwagenfahrer, Tuner, Groß- und Kleinserienhersteller wie Alpina, MTM, Manthey, Oettinger und viele weitere namhafte Unternehmen in der internationalen Automobilbranche.

Spitzentechnologie aus dem Motorsport
Viel mehr als eine sportliche Tieferlegung und ein ausgezeichnetes Fahrverhalten auf allen Straßen erhalten Sie mit dem KW V3. Es basiert auf unser langjährigen Erfahrung als Fahrwerkhersteller und Ausrüster im internationalen Motorsport wie etwa in den Tourenwagenserien ADAC GT Masters, FIA GT1, FIA GT3, International GT Open, WTC, VLN und auch beim legendären ADAC Zurich 24h-Rennen Nürburgring.
Ähnlich wie bei unseren Rennsport-Gewindefahrwerken aus dem KW Competition-Programm kann beim KW V3 die Zugstufe und die Druckstufe unabhängig voneinander eingestellt werden. Diese individuelle Abstimmungsmöglichkeit wird von Veredlern, Sportwagenmanufakturen, Tunern und anspruchsvollen Fahrern weltweit geschätzt.


Das perfekte Fahrwerksetup für deutlich mehr Fahrdynamik
Haben Sie an Ihrem sportlichen Straßenfahrzeug bereits erste Performance-Modifikationen durchgeführt, ist es ein Leichtes mit dem KW V3 diese zielgerichtet in der Dämpferabstimmung zu berücksichtigen. Die patentierte KW Ventiltechnik für die getrennte Abstimmung der Zug- und Druckstufe erlaubt es Ihnen die fahrzeugspezifische Grundabstimmung von KW individuell anzupassen. Beispielsweise gibt Ihnen das im Lowspeed-Bereich der Druckstufe in zwölf Klicks einstellbare KW-Bodenventil den Spielraum, selbst die Reifencharakteristik Ihrer High- und Ultra-High-Performance-Straßenreifen bei der Fahrwerkabstimmung zu berücksichtigen.
Durch die patentierte Druckstufeneinstellung am unteren Kolbenende des Edelstahlgehäuses benötigten Sie dazu nicht einmal Werkzeug. Die einstellbare Druckstufenabstimmung mit ihren zwölf exakten Klicks erlaubt es Ihnen per Hand auf Karosserieroll- und Wankbewegungen Einfluss zu nehmen, ohne dabei die optimal zur Federrate passende Zugstufendämpfung verändern zu müssen.
Mit der individuell einstellbaren Zugstufenabstimmung des KW V3 können Sie direkt das Handling und den Komfort durch die exakte Klickverstellung beeinflussen. Je nach Fahrzeugtyp werden die Zugstufenventile der KW Zweirohrdämpfer am oberen Ende der Kolbenstange über ein integriertes Einstellrädchen oder dem im Lieferumfang beinhalteten Aufsteck-Einstellrädchen abgestimmt.
Indem Sie über das Einstellrädchen die Zugkraft erhöhen, verringern sich die Aufbaubewegungen an der Karosserie. Ihr Auto fährt sich dadurch spurtreuer und Sie haben bei erhöhten Kurvengeschwindigkeiten noch mehr Stabilität. Wechseln Sie beispielsweise von den freigegebenen Rad/Reifenkombinationen Ihres Automobilherstellers zu größeren Felgen, können Sie mit dem KW V3 das Fahrverhalten Ihres Autos und Ihrer neuen Leichtmetallräder perfekt aufeinander abstimmen.


Hochwertig, individuell und langlebig
Schon während der Produktion wird das KW V3 ausgiebigen Qualitätstests unterzogen und jeder einzelne Dämpfer überprüft. Nur so werden wir unserem Anspruch gerecht, beim Einbau eines KW Gewindefahrwerks V3 durch einen KW Fachhandelspartner eine Garantie von bis zu fünf Jahren zu gewährleisten. Durch die filigrane Verarbeitung und der Nutzung hochwertiger Komponenten sind beispielsweise die KW Gewindefederbeine aus Edelstahl zu 100 Prozent rostfrei und besitzen eine unbegrenzte Lebensdauer.
Dadurch ist die Funktionsweise der stufenlosen Tieferlegung über das schmutzunempfindliche KW Trapezgewinde und den KW Polyamid-Gewindering auch nach Jahren nicht beeinträchtigt. Durch die individuelle Tieferlegung mit ihrem stufenlosen Verstellbereich können Sie die Sportlichkeit Ihres Fahrzeugs auch optisch betonen. Ein Feature, das in der Performanceorientierten Tuningszene sehr beliebt ist.

- in Zug- und Druckdämpfung frei einstellbare Dämpfungstechnik
- Edelstahltechnik inox-line
- individuelle, stufenlose Tieferlegung
- geprüfter Verstellbereich
- hochwertige Bauteile für lange Lebensdauer
- einstellbare Zugstufendämpfung mit 16 exakten Klicks
- 12-fach einstellbare Druckstufendämpfung mit Klickverstellung
- einzigartige, unabhängig voneinander wirkende Dämpfungskraftverstellung


Setup: Die individuell einstellbare Zug- & Druckstufendämpfung der KW V3
Das KW V3 ist das ideale Zubehör für Performance-orientierte Autofahrer und Tuningenthusiasten, die bei ihren Fahrzeugen einen großen Anspruch auf Sportlichkeit legen. Die separat in Zug- und Druckstufe einstellbaren Dämpfer erlauben dabei, mit ihrer durchdachten Klickverstellung eine umfangreiche Dämpferabstimmung vorzunehmen. So ist es ein Leichtes das Einlenkverhalten, die Spurtreue, den Reifengrip und Handling-Eigenschaften maßgeblich für eine sichere Kontrollierbarkeit im Grenzbereich direkt zu beeinflussen.

Bei Fahrzeugen mit elektronischer Dämpferregelung muss diese stillgelegt werden. Fahrzeugspezifische KW Stilllegungssätze finden Sie in der Zubehörtabelle.

Technische Informationen:

- Marke : KW
- Artikelnummer :  35281045 / 35281046
- Edelstahltechnik inox-line
- 12-fach einstellbare Druckstufendämpfung
- 16-fach einstellbare Zugstufendämpfung
- Individuelle, stufenlose Tieferlegung 
- Lieferumfang Set VA + HA Gewindefederbeine
- Achslast VA/HA (kg) bitte oben Auswählen / -1050
- hochwertige Bauteile für lange Lebensdauer
- Zulassung : Teilegutachten (§19.3)

 

Hinweis: Die Abbildung kann vom gelieferten Produkt abweichen

Achslast VA -965kg:

SEAT LEON ST (5F8) 09/2012- 1.0 TSi Kombi Benzin 63 KW 999 ccm 3 Frontantrieb
SEAT LEON ST (5F8) 09/2012- 1.0 TSI Kombi Benzin 85 KW 999 ccm 3 Frontantrieb
SEAT LEON ST (5F8) 09/2012- 1.2 TSI Kombi Benzin 63 KW 1197 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
SEAT LEON ST (5F8) 09/2012- 1.2 TSI Kombi Benzin 77 KW 1197 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
SEAT LEON ST (5F8) 09/2012- 1.2 TSI Kombi Benzin 81 KW 1197 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
SEAT LEON ST (5F8) 09/2012- 1.4 TSI Kombi Benzin 90 KW 1395 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
SEAT LEON ST (5F8) 09/2012- 1.4 TSI Kombi Benzin 92 KW 1395 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
SEAT LEON ST (5F8) 09/2012- 1.4 TSI Kombi Benzin 103 KW 1395 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
SEAT LEON ST (5F8) 09/2012- 1.4 TSI Kombi Benzin 110 KW 1395 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
SEAT LEON ST (5F8) 09/2012- 1.5 TSI Kombi Benzin 96 KW 1495 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
SEAT LEON ST (5F8) 09/2012- 1.5 TSI Kombi Benzin 110 KW 1495 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
SEAT LEON ST (5F8) 09/2012- 1.6 TDI Kombi Diesel 66 KW 1598 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
SEAT LEON ST (5F8) 09/2012- 1.6 TDI Kombi Diesel 81 KW 1598 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
SEAT LEON ST (5F8) 09/2012- 1.6 TDI Kombi Diesel 85 KW 1598 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
SEAT LEON ST (5F8) 09/2012- 1.8 TSI Kombi Benzin 132 KW 1798 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
SEAT LEON ST (5F8) 09/2012- 2.0 TDI Kombi Diesel 105 KW 1968 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
VW GOLF VII Variant (AUV, BA5, BV5) 04/2013- 1.0 TSI Kombi Benzin 63 KW 999 ccm 3 Frontantrieb
VW GOLF VII Variant (AUV, BA5, BV5) 04/2013- 1.0 TSI Kombi Benzin 81 KW 999 ccm 3 Frontantrieb
VW GOLF VII Variant (AUV, BA5, BV5) 04/2013- 1.0 TSI Kombi Benzin 85 KW 999 ccm 3 Frontantrieb
VW GOLF VII Variant (AUV, BA5, BV5) 04/2013- 1.2 TSI Kombi Benzin 63 KW 1197 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
VW GOLF VII Variant (AUV, BA5, BV5) 04/2013- 1.2 TSI Kombi Benzin 77 KW 1197 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
VW GOLF VII Variant (AUV, BA5, BV5) 04/2013- 1.2 TSI Kombi Benzin 81 KW 1197 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
VW GOLF VII Variant (AUV, BA5, BV5) 04/2013- 1.4 TSI Kombi Benzin 90 KW 1395 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
VW GOLF VII Variant (AUV, BA5, BV5) 04/2013- 1.4 TSI Kombi Benzin 92 KW 1395 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
VW GOLF VII Variant (AUV, BA5, BV5) 04/2013- 1.4 TSI Kombi Benzin 103 KW 1395 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
VW GOLF VII Variant (AUV, BA5, BV5) 04/2013- 1.4 TSI Kombi Benzin 110 KW 1395 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
VW GOLF VII Variant (AUV, BA5, BV5) 04/2013- 1.5 TSI Kombi Benzin 96 KW 1495 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
VW GOLF VII Variant (AUV, BA5, BV5) 04/2013- 1.5 TSI Kombi Benzin 110 KW 1498 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
VW GOLF VII Variant (AUV, BA5, BV5) 04/2013- 1.6 Kombi Benzin 81 KW 1598 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
VW GOLF VII Variant (AUV, BA5, BV5) 04/2013- 1.8 TSI Kombi Benzin 125 KW 1798 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
VW GOLF VII Variant (AUV, BA5, BV5) 04/2013- 2.0 GTD Kombi Diesel 130 KW 1968 ccm 4 Frontantrieb

Achslast VA 966-1090kg:

SEAT LEON ST (5F8) 09/2012- 1.0 TSi Kombi Benzin 63 KW 999 ccm 3 Frontantrieb
SEAT LEON ST (5F8) 09/2012- 1.5 TSI Kombi Benzin 96 KW 1495 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
SEAT LEON ST (5F8) 09/2012- 1.5 TSI Kombi Benzin 110 KW 1495 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
SEAT LEON ST (5F8) 09/2012- 1.6 TDI Kombi Diesel 66 KW 1598 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
SEAT LEON ST (5F8) 09/2012- 1.6 TDI Kombi Diesel 77 KW 1598 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
SEAT LEON ST (5F8) 09/2012- 1.6 TDI Kombi Diesel 81 KW 1598 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
SEAT LEON ST (5F8) 09/2012- 1.6 TDI Kombi Diesel 85 KW 1598 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
SEAT LEON ST (5F8) 09/2012- 1.8 TSI Kombi Benzin 132 KW 1798 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
SEAT LEON ST (5F8) 09/2012- 2.0 TDI Kombi Diesel 81 KW 1968 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
SEAT LEON ST (5F8) 09/2012- 2.0 TDI Kombi Diesel 105 KW 1968 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
SEAT LEON ST (5F8) 09/2012- 2.0 TDI Kombi Diesel 110 KW 1968 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
SEAT LEON ST (5F8) 09/2012- 2.0 TDI Kombi Diesel 135 KW 1968 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
SEAT LEON ST (5F8) 09/2012- 2.0 TSI Kombi Benzin 140 KW 1984 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
VW GOLF VII Variant (AUV, BA5, BV5) 04/2013- 1.6 Kombi Benzin 81 KW 1598 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
VW GOLF VII Variant (AUV, BA5, BV5) 04/2013- 1.6 TDI Kombi Diesel 66 KW 1598 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
VW GOLF VII Variant (AUV, BA5, BV5) 04/2013- 1.6 TDI Kombi Diesel 77 KW 1598 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
VW GOLF VII Variant (AUV, BA5, BV5) 04/2013- 1.6 TDI Kombi Diesel 81 KW 1598 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
VW GOLF VII Variant (AUV, BA5, BV5) 04/2013- 1.6 TDI Kombi Diesel 85 KW 1598 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
VW GOLF VII Variant (AUV, BA5, BV5) 04/2013- 1.8 TSI Kombi Benzin 125 KW 1798 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
VW GOLF VII Variant (AUV, BA5, BV5) 04/2013- 2.0 GTD Kombi Diesel 130 KW 1968 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
VW GOLF VII Variant (AUV, BA5, BV5) 04/2013- 2.0 GTD Kombi Diesel 135 KW 1968 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
VW GOLF VII Variant (AUV, BA5, BV5) 04/2013- 2.0 TDI Kombi Diesel 81 KW 1968 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
VW GOLF VII Variant (AUV, BA5, BV5) 04/2013- 2.0 TDI Kombi Diesel 110 KW 1968 ccm 4 Frontantrieb

 

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 68325283437

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 8 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
T
Verified Purchase
The product comes in multiple colors, but the function is terrible
San Leandro, US
★★★★★ 5
Goodbye for the value
Color: 02-black
Great value looks wonderful very adorable
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 31, 2026
J
Verified Purchase
J. Thomas Campbell
Battle Creek, US
★★★★★ 5
David Rohl: A "Maverick" in Search of History
Format: Paperback
Recently I wrote a review of Peter Enns' book "The Evolution of Adam" in which I made a brief reference to David Rohl's "From Eden to Exile: The 5000 Year History of the People of the Bible." Several friends who read the review emailed me, curious about Rohl's book and encouraging me to follow up on Enns' book with a somewhat detailed review of From Eden to Exile. Hence...this review. From Eden to Exile is Rohl's own "follow-up" to his previous book "Pharaohs and Kings: A Biblical Quest." It's important here that I inform the reader of the following: (1) Pharaohs and Kings (in my view) is a far more compelling book than From Eden to Exile; and (2) I would strongly recommend that readers unfamiliar with Rohl read Pharaohs and Kings, prior to reading From Eden to Exile. With these thoughts in mind (and before commenting on Eden to Exile), I believe it will prove worthwhile to focus briefly on Rohl's Pharaohs and Kings prior to moving on to his second book - the two being closely related in terms of subject matter. First, it needs to be stated here at the outset that Rohl (unfortunately) has not received much in the way of either praise and/or encouragment from his fellow Egyptologists, most of whom see him as a sort of "reckless intruder" into the discipline, presenting arguments for a revised chronology (what Rohl refers to as "the New Chronology") that his critics appear to regard as little more than fanciful speculation. This is most unfortunate. Rohl's views are fully deserving of critical assessment; however, the casual (sometimes contemptuous) manner with which his views have been almost entirely dismissed hardly constitutes the "finest hour" in the discipline of ancient Egyptian studies - and this would include the oftentimes quite dismissive attitude of Kenneth A. Kitchen, an Egyptologist and conservative Christian who has written his own book on the subject:"On the Reliability of the Old Testament," Eerdmans, 2003. I clearly am no scholar on the history of ancient Egypt. On the other hand, I have been reading on the subject extensively now for more than 40 years - and this out of sheer love for the subject as opposed to academic profession. And one thing I have learned throughout this reading process is that ancient Egyptian chronology is - for a certainty - in some degree of chaos. (It's not all that difficult to locate comments to this effect from Egyptologists themselves). The standard reference guide for the chronology of ancient Egypt is based foundationally on a chronological history of the ancient pharaohs that dates all the way back to the writings of an Egyptian priest named Manetho, whose written account dates to the third century BC - not exactly what we normally consider "the latest available evidence." Furthermore, Manetho's account itself has not survived; what we do know of it is to be found in the writings of Josephus (first century AD), and the early church fathers Julius Africanus (third century AD) and Eusebius (fourth century AD). Indeed, Egyptian scholar (and conservative Christian) James K. Hoffmeier acknowledges as much in his recent book "Ancient Israel in Sinai" (Oxford, 2005) when he writes regarding Manetho's account: "It is widely acknowledged that names are garbled and that some of the dynasties are not sequential but contemporaneous, and that there are clearly legendary stories preserved... Nevertheless," he continues, "Manetho is taken seriously in historical studies." Indeed he is! Egyptologists have precious little more to go on from the ancient world other than Manetho's account. And yet it is somewhat astonishing to discover the extent to which Manetho's account has been (for the most part) dogmatized into a rigid system that appears to be unyielding. And it is against this rigid wall of Egyptological dogmatism that Rohl must butt his head. (Little wonder that he is not fondly regarded within the discipline). That being said, I would strongly caution all readers (and especially readers of the Old Testament, where a good deal of its chronology is tied directly to Manetho's modernized system) to regard this correlation - between OT chronology and Egyptian chronology - with some degree of appropriate caution. In fact, the very controversy over the date of the Exodus (13th century or 15th century) is related directly to the unbridled confusion surrounding ancient Egyptian chronology. As regards From Eden to Exile I would state the following: (1) Rohl's treatment of early Genesis (Adam to Abraham) is highly speculative and he appears to be connecting dots that were never intended to be contiguous; (2) his book takes on greater promise when he reaches the area of his own particular expertise: Joseph in Egypt. Rohl places Joseph firmly within the 12th dynasty, during the reign of pharaohs Senuseret III and Amenemhat III - and his arguments here (despite the standard protest from his fellow scholars) are highly compelling and fully deserving of something other than "we standard Egyptologists always know best!" (Quite frankly, I've reached the point where I believe a more positive - and more accurate! - understanding of ancient Egyptian chronology will have to await the work of younger scholars (and Rohl has plenty of them!) who are more willing to think outside the box by considering other possibilities. As so often happens, we must simply wait for the 'old guard' to retire so that younger scholars - with fresh ideas and a willingness to engage new evidence - can take their place.) And, finally (3); although much of From Eden to Exile is written in a style reminiscent of historical novels, this should not (in and of itself) cause the reader to think that all we have here is manufactured storyline. On the contrary (certainly beginning with Joseph), Rohl weaves his factual history into the unfolding story in such a way as to make the history not only real but filled with life and event. Furthermore, Rohl fully acknowledges in his Introduction that he will be telling a narrative story as he seeks to "fill in the gaps" where hard evidence from ancient historical sources is plain and simply unavailable. And because Rohl distances himself from any particular religious affiliation it means that both evangelicals and fundamentalists should be able to read his account to great profit, without becoming unduly disturbed by some of his conclusions (e.g., the first five chapters). Indeed, his astonishing defense of the historical integrity of the biblical account displays enormous objectivity, far surpassing (in many ways) various books on the subject that have been produced by Christian publishers throughout the past 25 years. I would like to conclude my comments here by strongly urging all evangelical OT scholars to thoroughly familiarize themselves with Rohl's writings - Pharaohs and Kings in particular. Despite his critics this book is entirely deserving of serious reflection. His defense of a 15th century date for the Exodus is (in my view...and the view of many others) highly compelling and by no means easy to dismiss. (I fully understand that most evangelical scholars opt for the later date of 1250 BC during the reign of Rameses II). One continues to wonder, however, why the reference to Rameses in Genesis 47:11 is so easily regarded as an anachronism while Exodus 1:11 somehow places one firmly within the reign of Rameses II. Or why the clear reference to 480 years in 1 Kings 6:1 is so easily dismissed as most likely merely symbolic as opposed to actual - this despite the additional support for a literal understanding of these years that one gets from Joshua 11:26. But then we already know why: standard Egyptian chronology places Rameses II in the mid-thirteenth century BC, all of which "harmonizes" so well with Exodus 1:11. Thus, ipso facto, the Exodus occurred @ 1250 BC. I find myself far more persuaded by Rohl's account of the Hyksos invasion of Egypt (very likely the Asiatic Amalakites of Exodus 17) following upon the Exodus, when Egypt was almost disemboweled and severely weakened by a God named Yahweh, then any other account of the Hyksos invasion I have ever read from any standard Egyptian historian. (By the way: a quick perusal of ten books in my own library on ancient Egypt displays an enormous amount of diversity and subjective opinion, a rather clear indication that (voices to the contrary) there is precious little overall harmony and understanding amongst the scholars themselves when dealing with numerous aspects of ancient Egypt and its pharaohs.) Perhaps all of Rohl's conclusions are entirely bogus. Nonetheless, the massive amount of information he offers the reader for serious consideration needs to be offset by responsible Egyptian historians who can demonstrate (clearly and persuasively) the error of his ways, and do so with strong and powerful evidence that will illustrate the point. (Ad hominen arguments are worthless as a retort.) I have yet to see such a detailed book (with good, solid evidence as opposed to preferred dogmatism) written in response to the growing body of historical evidence that Rohl and his staff of young investigators are busy compiling. This fact alone only raises more unsettling questions regarding the overall integrity of an Egyptian chronology that rests almost entirely and uncritically on a now lost document that dates back to several centuries before Christ. Rohl, via his own admission, is clearly outside the Christian faith...or any other faith. However, in terms of defending the historical integrity of scripture, he may well be the best friend any believer ever had. All the more, therefore, is the pity that OT scholars either have chosen to ignore him entirely...or (the more likely alternative) have never even heard of him. Hopefully...this will change in the very near future.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 21, 2012
M
Verified Purchase
Mark W. Miller
Belleville, US
★★★★★ 5
the garden was a real place, legends do have seeds of truth
Format: Paperback, Format: Paperback
very well researched and the use of multiple sources/ events used to lock in events and CHRONOLOGIES is done with a sense of going where the evidence leads, instead of trying to CREATE a narrative. it is amazing how the people and place names shift thru the various empires and then later, the legends. very interesting that the exodus event vanquishes egypt, the the hyksos/ indo europeans take over and loot upper egypt. I totally agree with shishak mistake and new chronology. I find it fascinating king Akhenaten and tut were contemporary with king david and soloman. very interesting read about etruscians/ rome and carthage being remnants of troy. I love history this was a very interesting read. but be prepared for a menagerie of languages and names.....
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 7, 2020
P
Verified Purchase
Paco
Battle Creek, US
★★★★★ 4
Time will tell.
Format: Paperback
The New Chronology, the unorthodox historical time frame upon which this book is based, may be regarded by Professor Kitchen and other expert scholars in this field as 'one hundred per cent rubbish' but that does not prevent this book from being a very interesting and enjoyable read. As to the correctness or otherwise of the theory advanced, only time will tell.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 10, 2013
K
Verified Purchase
KEN TELLS ALL
Belleville, US
★★★★★ 5
From Eden to Exile: The Five Thousand Year History of The People of The Bible
Format: Paperback
Well written book about a very interesting subject. Author is basically restructuring the traditionally accepted royal dynasty time periods of the Egyptian Pharaohs. I do accept that the traditional ancient time spans are mostly not accurate. This inaccuracy causes problems when trying to date other cultures of the same periods. The prime example is the biblical history of the Hebrews. When adjusting the Egyptian historical writings to around 200 years later you then do see references to accounts of a people who might have been the ancient Hebrews. It is interesting that we accept Egyptian history, as written in stone, but not the Hebrew written history. This author, and others, are disputing this accepted dating of Egyptian royal dynastic rule. The author tells a purely historical biblical history leaving religious commentary out of it. I don't agree with all his story but a great part of it is very possible. The bible is a religious and historical writing but it is possible to separate the two. The possibility of this new time frame being correct would change present day archaeology dramatically and would likely confirm much of secular biblical history. Ancient history of a particular culture must be correct in order to say if another culture existed at the same time. Right now Egyptian dating is being used to judge as to whether the biblical history is true. This of course is a very dubious yard stick. Who says ancient Egyptian writings are 100% true? Many have been found to be for political & religious purposes and not necessarily true. This book is an eye opener and puts a big ? mark about current historical dating and what is true and false about ancient Israel !
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 22, 2010

recommand products