Pay in installments of $31.24 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 23 - Aug 28
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Portrait of Pope Pius VExploring the Historical Significance of the Portrait of Pope Pius V The Life and Legacy of Pope Pius V Pope Pius V, born Antonio Ghislieri in 1504, served as the 225th pope from 1566 until his death in 1572. He is best known for excommunicating Queen Elizabeth I of England and for implementing the Roman Catechism. His papacy marked a pivotal moment in the Catholic Church, especially during the tumultuous times of the Protestant Reformation. Key
Exploring the Historical Significance of the Portrait of Pope Pius V
The Life and Legacy of Pope Pius V
Pope Pius V, born Antonio Ghislieri in 1504, served as the 225th pope from 1566 until his death in 1572. He is best known for excommunicating Queen Elizabeth I of England and for implementing the Roman Catechism. His papacy marked a pivotal moment in the Catholic Church, especially during the tumultuous times of the Protestant Reformation.Key Events in the Papacy of Pope Pius V
One of the most significant events during his papacy was the Battle of Lepanto in 1571, where the Holy League defeated the Ottoman Empire. This victory was celebrated as a divine intervention, and Pius V established the feast of Our Lady of Victory to commemorate it. His canonization of St. Pius V in 1712 further solidified his legacy within the Church.Influence on the Catholic Church and Counter-Reformation
Pope Pius V played a crucial role in the Counter-Reformation, a movement aimed at reforming the Church and countering Protestantism. He enforced the reforms of the Council of Trent, which included the standardization of the Mass and the promotion of the Tridentine Mass. His efforts helped to restore Catholic unity and discipline during a time of great division.Palma il Giovane: The Master Behind the Portrait
Palma il Giovane, born in 1544, was a prominent Venetian painter known for his vibrant colors and dynamic compositions. His full name was Palma il Giovane, distinguishing him from his grandfather, Palma il Vecchio. He became a leading figure in the Venetian Renaissance, blending traditional techniques with innovative styles.Artistic Style and Techniques of Palma il Giovane
Palma il Giovane's artistic style is characterized by rich color palettes and dramatic lighting. He often employed chiaroscuro, a technique that contrasts light and shadow to create depth. His portraits, including that of Pope Pius V, showcase his ability to capture the subject's personality and authority through expressive facial features and detailed attire.Palma il Giovane's Contribution to Venetian Renaissance Art
As a key figure in the Venetian Renaissance, Palma il Giovane contributed to the evolution of portraiture. His works reflect the cultural richness of Venice during the 16th century. He was influenced by the works of Titian and Tintoretto, yet he developed a unique style that emphasized emotional expression and narrative depth.Symbolism and Iconography in the Portrait of Pope Pius V
The Portrait of Pope Pius V is rich in symbolism, reflecting the pope's authority and spiritual significance. The attire and regalia worn by the pope are not merely decorative; they convey his role as the spiritual leader of the Catholic Church.Understanding the Attire and Regalia of the Pope
Pope Pius V is depicted wearing the papal tiara and the white cassock, symbols of his papal authority. The tiara represents the pope's spiritual and temporal power, while the white cassock signifies purity and devotion. These elements are essential in understanding the pope's role during the Counter-Reformation.Color Palette and Its Significance in Religious Art
The color palette used in the portrait is significant. Rich reds and golds symbolize the divine and the sacred, while the use of white highlights the pope's purity. The colors evoke a sense of reverence and authority, aligning with the values of the Catholic Church during this period.The Artistic Context of the 16th Century
The 16th century was a transformative time for art, particularly in Italy. The Renaissance brought about new ideas and techniques that changed how artists approached portraiture.Renaissance Art Movements and Their Impact on Portraiture
During the Renaissance, artists began to focus on realism and human emotion. This shift allowed for more lifelike representations in portraiture. Palma il Giovane's work exemplifies this trend, as he captures the essence of Pope Pius V with remarkable detail and emotional depth.Comparative Analysis with Other Papal Portraits of the Era
When compared to other papal portraits of the era, Palma il Giovane's depiction of Pope Pius V stands out for its emotional resonance. Unlike more rigid representations, this portrait conveys a sense of warmth and approachability, reflecting the pope's character and leadership style.Visual Elements of the Portrait: A Closer Look
Composition and Arrangement in the Painting
The composition of the Portrait of Pope Pius V is carefully arranged to draw the viewer's eye to the pope's face and attire. The background is subtly muted, allowing the subject to stand out prominently.Use of Space and Perspective in the Portrait
Palma il Giovane skillfully uses space to create a sense of depth. The perspective draws the viewer into the scene, making the pope appear both authoritative and approachable. This technique enhances the overall impact of the portrait.Facial Expressions and Their Emotional Resonance
The facial expression of Pope Pius V is serene yet commanding. His gaze conveys wisdom and compassion, inviting viewers to connect with his spiritual authority. This emotional resonance is a hallmark of Palma il Giovane's portraiture.Materials and Techniques Used by Palma il Giovane
Palma il Giovane employed traditional oil painting techniques that allowed for rich textures and vibrant colors. His mastery of these techniques is evident in the Portrait of Pope Pius V.Oil Painting Techniques: Layering and Glazing
The artist used layering and glazing to achieve depth and luminosity in the painting. This method involves applying multiple thin layers of paint, creating a rich visual experience that enhances the portrait's realism.Brushwork and Texture in the Portrait
Palma il Giovane's brushwork is both precise and expressive. The texture of the fabric in the pope's attire is rendered with meticulous detail, showcasing the artist's skill and attention to detail.Impact and Reception of the Portrait Over Time
Historical Context of the Painting's Commission
The Portrait of Pope Pius V was commissioned during a time of significant religious upheaval. The Catholic Church sought to reinforce its authority and image through art, making this portrait a vital piece of religious propaganda.Patrons and Their Influence on Artistic Production
Patrons played a crucial role in the production of religious art during the Renaissance. The commission of this portrait reflects the desire of the Church to promote the papacy's image and influence.Public Reception and Critique in the 16th Century
Upon its completion, the portrait received acclaim for its lifelike representation and emotional depth. Critics praised Palma il Giovane for capturing the essence of Pope Pius V, solidifying the painting's place in art history.Modern Interpretations and Cultural Relevance
Today, the Portrait of Pope Pius V is viewed as a significant work of art that reflects the values and struggles of the Catholic Church during the Counter-Reformation.How the Portrait is Viewed in Contemporary Art Criticism
Contemporary art critics appreciate the portrait for its historical context and artistic merit. It serves as a reminder of the power of art in shaping religious and cultural narratives.Influence on Modern Religious Art and Iconography
The portrait continues to influence modern religious art, inspiring artists to explore themes of authority, spirituality, and identity. Its impact is evident in various forms of religious iconography today.Frequently Asked Questions About the Portrait of Pope Pius V
What is the historical context of the Portrait of Pope Pius V?
The portrait was created during the Counter-Reformation, a time when the Catholic Church sought to reaffirm its authority in response to Protestantism.What artistic techniques did Palma il Giovane use in this painting?
Palma il Giovane used oil painting techniques, including layering and glazing, to create depth and vibrancy in the portrait.How does the portrait reflect the values of the Counter-Reformation?
The portrait emphasizes the pope's authority and spiritual significance, aligning with the Catholic Church's efforts to promote its values during the Counter-Reformation.What are the key symbols present in the portrait?
Key symbols include the papal tiara and white cassock, representing the pope's authority and purity.How has the reception of the painting changed over the centuries?
Initially praised for its lifelike representation, the portrait is now recognized for its historical significance and artistic merit in contemporary art criticism.What is the significance of Pope Pius V in Catholic history?
Pope Pius V is significant for his role in the Counter-Reformation and for implementing reforms that shaped the Catholic Church's direction.How can I appreciate the details in the reproduction of this painting?
To appreciate the details in a reproduction, focus on the textures, colors, and emotional expressions captured in the artwork, which are often more vivid than in standard prints.What should I know about the artistic style of Palma il Giovane?
Palma il Giovane's style is characterized by vibrant colors, emotional depth, and a blend of traditional and innovative techniques, making his works stand out in the Venetian Renaissance.Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 11 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
I'm rereading the book. It's great!
The idea of progress is a relatively knew idea within the history of humans. The idea of progress is fundamental to the ideas of Capitalism and economic growth. Many Americans blindly believe that of progress, economic growth, and Capitalism are leading to the betterment of humans. If one carefully reads the IPCC's Fifth Assessment Report, it states that CO2 (and other greenhouse gasses) emissions are driving global warming and thus climate change. That report also says that economic growth and population growth are driving those emissions.
Climate change is one of the "progress traps" Wright is talking about. Progress does not inexorably lead to the betterment of humans. Nor do growth economies, including Capitalism. Wright helps readers see the big pictures of how humans have interacted with the Earth in ways that destroy civilizations and threatens to ruin our host, Earth.
The Myth of Progress by Tom Wessells is another good book about progress.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 24, 2018
★★★★★ 4
Each time history repeats itself, the price goes up
What is the difference between our 21st century global civilization, the ancient Sumerians, the Easter Islanders of Cook's day, empirical Rome, or the Maya civilization. Answer, not much. The last four are all societies that had their heyday, become stuck in a paradigm, and then brought ecological disaster on themselves via overpopulation and over exploitation of natural resources. "Each time history repeats itself, the price goes up", Wrights quotes from some pertinent graffiti. The cost this time could be in the billions of souls.
This a short book 132 pages of actual text with another 68 or so of footnotes at the end. It is a mad rush through human history exploring the collapse of those civilizations and a couple that have been more sustainable.
Wright also explores the traps of progress. That is mankind becomes so good at hunting he drives his food source into extinction. Then we become so proficient at an irrigation technology we ruin the land. We become so good at weapons we create bombs that could ruin the whole world. As a race, he contends, we seem to push every technology to the brink, to our collective woe.
I read with highlighter in hand. I had to restrain myself for marking whole long sections. As it is, the book now has a pink glow. Several pages have yellow tabs so I can find passages easily again. One such passage from the book summarizes it for me:
"The human inability to foresee - or to watch out for - long-range consequences may be inherent to our kind, shaped by the millions of years when we lived from hand to mouth by hunting and gathering. It may also be little more than a mix of inertia, greed, and foolishness encouraged by the shape of the social pyramid. The concentration of power at the top of large-scale societies gives the elite a vested interest in the status quo; they continue to prosper in darkening times long after the environment and general populace begin to suffer."
I remember as a biology major we studied the boom and bust cycle of animal populations. It was suggested in class that the human animal could follow the same cycle. The professor dismissed the idea, but not so Wright. He sees us at the high point in a few years, then the collapse unless we act now.
One other passage really struck home with me: "The idea that the world must be run by the stock market is as mad as any other fundamentalist delusion, Islamic, Christian, or Marxist." That tears at the very sand we have our society built on.
The sheer pace of Wright's march through history mirrors the author's urgency about how long we have to act to save our society. The countdown has already begun. The question remains, do we have the gumption to take the necessary action.
The book is at its heart liberal, and rightly so. Any possible solution to forestall the potential social collapse will not be from the top of the pyramid. They long ago seemed to have forgotten the concept of usufruct; we are just borrowing this planet from our children and grandchildren. Wright holds out a glimmer of hope, but the candle is flickering.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 21, 2010
★★★★★ 5
A short book loaded with sharp insights
Every year, Canadians eagerly huddle around their radios to listen to the Massey Lectures, broadcast by the CBC. For the 2004 season, Ronald Wright was the honored speaker. He presented a series of five lectures, titled A Short History of Progress. In 2005, Wright's presentation was published as a short book, and it became a bestseller. Martin Scorsese's movie, Surviving Progress, was based on the book.
It was an amazing success for a story contrary to our most holy cultural myths. Wright believed that the benefits of progress were highly overrated, because of their huge costs. Indeed, progress was approaching the point of becoming a serious threat to the existence of humankind. "This new century will not grow very old before we enter an age of chaos and collapse that will dwarf all the dark ages in our past."
He pointed out that the world was dotted with the ruins of ancient crash sites, civilizations that self-destructed. At each of these wrecks, modern science can, in essence, retrieve the "black box," and discover why the mighty society crashed and burned. There is a clear pattern. Each one crashed because it destroyed what it depended on for its survival.
Wright takes us on a quick tour of the collapse of Sumer, Easter Island, the Roman Empire, and the Mayans. He explains why the two oddballs, China and Egypt, are taking longer than average to self-destruct. The fatal defects of agriculture and civilization are old news for the folks who have been paying attention. It has become customary for these folks to believe that "The Fall" took place when humans began to domesticate plants and animals.
Wright thinks the truth is more complicated. What makes this book unique and provocative is his notion of progress traps. The benefits of innovation often encourage society to live in a new way, while burning the bridges behind them as they advance. Society can find itself trapped in an unsustainable way of living, and it's no longer possible to just turn around and painlessly return to a simpler mode. Like today, we know that the temporary bubble of cheap energy is about over, and our entire way of life is dependent on cheap energy. We're trapped.
Some types of progress do not disrupt the balance of the ecosystem, like using a rock to crack nuts. But our ability to stand upright freed our hands for working with tools and weapons, which launched a million year process of experimentation and innovation that gradually snowballed over time.
We tend to assume that during the long era of hunting and gathering our ancestors were as mindful as the few hunting cultures that managed to survive on the fringes into the twentieth century. But in earlier eras, when big game was abundant, wise stewardship was not mandatory. Sloppy tribes could survive -- for a while.
Before they got horses, Indians of the American west would drive herds of buffalo off cliffs, killing many at a time. They took what they needed, and left the rest for legions of scavengers. One site in Colorado contained the carcasses of 152 buffalo. A trader in the northern Rockies witnessed about 250 buffalo being killed at one time. Wright mentioned two Upper Paleolithic sites I had not heard of -- 1,000 mammoth skeletons were found at Piedmont in the Czech Republic, and the remains of over 100,000 horses were found at Solutré in France.
Over time, progress perfected our hunting systems. Our supply of high-quality food seemed to be infinite. It was our first experience of prosperity and leisure. Folks had time to take their paint sets into caves and do gorgeous portraits of the animals they lived with, venerated, killed, and ate.
Naturally, our population grew. More babies grew up to be hunters, and the availability of game eventually decreased. The grand era of cave painting ended, and we began hunting rabbits. We depleted species after species, unconsciously gliding into our first serious progress trap.
Some groups scrambled to find alternatives, foraging around beaches, estuaries, wetlands, and bogs. Some learned how to reap the tiny seeds of wild grasses. By and by, the end of the hunting way of life came into view, about 10,000 years ago. "They lived high for a while, then starved."
Having destroyed the abundant game, it was impossible to return to simpler living. This was a progress trap, and it led directly into a far more dangerous progress trap, the domestication of plants and animals. Agriculture and civilization were accidents, and they threw open the gateway to 10,000 years of monotony, drudgery, misery, and ecocide. Wright says that civilization is a pyramid scheme; we live today at the expense of those who come after us.
For most of human history, the rate of progress was so slow that it was usually invisible. But the last six or seven generations have been blindsided by a typhoon of explosive change. Progress had a habit of giving birth to problems that could only be solved by more progress. Progress was the most diabolically wicked curse that you could ever imagine. Maybe we should turn it into an insulting obscenity: "progress you!"
Climate scientists have created models showing weather trends over the last 250,000 years, based on ice cores. Agriculture probably didn't start earlier because climate trends were unstable. Big swings could take place over the course of decades. In the last 10,000 years, the climate has been unusually stable. A return to instability will make civilization impossible.
Joseph Tainter studied how civilizations collapse, and he described three highways to disaster: the Runaway Train (out-of-control problems), the Dinosaur (indifference to dangers), and the House of Cards (irreversible disintegration). He predicted that the next collapse would be global in scale.
Finally, the solution: "The reform that is needed is... simply the transition from short-term thinking to long-term." Can we do it?
We are quite clever, but seldom wise, according to Wright. Ordinary animals, like our ancestors, had no need for long-term thinking, because life was always lived in the here and now. "Free Beer Tomorrow" reads the flashing neon sign on the tavern, but we never exist in tomorrow.
The great news is that we now possess a mountain of black boxes. For the first time in the human journey, a growing number of people comprehend our great mistakes, and are capable of envisioning a new path that eventually abandons our embarrassing boo-boos forever. All the old barriers to wisdom and healing have been swept away (in theory).
Everywhere you look these days; people are stumbling around staring at tiny screens and furiously typing -- eagerly communicating with world experts, engaging in profound discussions, watching videos rich with illuminating information, and reading the works of green visionaries. It's a magnificent sight to behold -- the best is yet to come!
Richard Adrian Reese
Author of What Is Sustainable
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 20, 2013
★★★★★ 5
Wright is right
The fact Wright attacks popular concepts of progress is enough to merit five stars.
Until 1955, when I was 25, I naively believed progress was inevitable, natural, and simply a part of human nature and society. I attended the Earl Lectures that year. Swiss Theologian Emil Brunner presented three addresses on "Faith, Hope, and Love" at Berkeley, California. Westminster Press published his series in a book given the same title. I shall quote a few remarks.
Brunner traced the burgioning faith in progress to the nineteenth century, when "Darwin's theory of evolution seemed so to support and enlarge this optimistic evaluation of progress as to see it in a cosmic perspective." But the doctrine of progress is not the same as evolution.
"Although this idea of progress had a success for which the word 'triumph' is hardly an exaggeration, there were warning voices raised against it, voices of men of weight and importance who were not willng to accept the new doctrine," he said. "It was a new doctrine because it was not known to antiquity, it was not known in the time of the Reformation, it was unknown in all Asiatic culture. It was a new thing! The idea of progress became an axiomatic conviction which needed no proof and could not be disproved."
At one point, Brunner said, "Since Hiroshima the world does not believe in progress anymore." The end of WWII was still fresh in our memories, and I suppose that's why he said it. We know, today, that it didn't take long for much of the world to revive and renew its faith in progress. And now it's stronger--and more dangerous--than ever.
I'm not opposed to every aspect of progress. Progress, when it moves in wholesome and healthy directions, is a blessing. I'm glad my dentist is able to fill--and save--my teeth without pain. And when it came time for my doctor to pull my cataracts and replace them with implanted lenses, I marveled at the miracle. It was a quick and painless operation, and now I have wonderful vision.
It's that dogmatic idea of progress based on greed and cold indifference to global warming that concerns me. It's that ongoing waste of limited resources, whether they be animal, vegetable or mineral, that concerns me. We are pulling the carpet from beneath our feet, and the king is pulling hardest of all. And who is the king? Ignorance! Ignorance is king!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 21, 2008
★★★★★ 5
My favorite book, in any genre
Ronald Wright is an amazing scholar and writer. His style is fun and easy to read while delivering impeccable historical research. I have listed to this book several times over the years and I appreciate it more each time. I recommend the audio version more than the print version because of the compelling way Mr. Wright delivers this 4-Part lecture series to his audience (now in book form).
Note to Amazon: Please make this book available on Audible, CDs are cumbersome.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 3, 2018