SKU: 7415255444

Figurine Hot Toys MMS309 - Marvel Comics - Iron Man 3 - Iron Man Shotgun Mark 40 Standard Version

Sale price$184.50 Regular price$205.00
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $51.25 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 20 - Aug 25

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Figurine Hot Toys MMS309 - Marvel Comics - Iron Man 3 - Iron Man Shotgun Mark 40 Standard VersionIRON MAN 3 SHOTGUN (MARK XL) FIGURINE DE COLLECTION L'CHELLE 1 6 Dans le film Iron Man 3 de Marvel, un grand nombre de nouvelles armures Iron Man ont t prsentes pour le protocole House Party de Tony Stark. Elles ont t utilises lors du climax du film, lorsque Tony a affront Aldrich Killian et ses soldats Extremis. Aujourd'hui, Hot Toys a le plaisir de prsenter officiellement la figurine de collection l'chelle 1 6 du Shotgun Mark XL, une armure hyper

IRON MAN 3
SHOTGUN (MARK XL)
FIGURINE DE COLLECTION À L'ÉCHELLE 1/6
Dans le film Iron Man 3 de Marvel, un grand nombre de nouvelles armures Iron Man ont été présentées pour le protocole House Party de Tony Stark. Elles ont été utilisées lors du climax du film, lorsque Tony a affronté Aldrich Killian et ses soldats Extremis.

Aujourd'hui, Hot Toys a le plaisir de présenter officiellement la figurine de collection à l'échelle 1/6 du Shotgun Mark XL, une armure hyper rapide au design élégant que Tony Stark a utilisée pour combattre Aldrich Killian au corps à corps !

La figurine a été spécialement conçue d'après l'image de Robert Downey Jr. dans le rôle de Tony Stark/Shotgun dans Iron Man 3. Elle présente un design d'armure distinctif avec une peinture bleu métallique et argentée, une tête sculptée avec casque endommagée au combat et fonction d'éclairage LED, des pièces d'armure interchangeables endommagées au combat, des fonctions d'éclairage LED dans la poitrine, les paumes et le torse, ainsi qu'un socle circulaire dynamique.

Une édition spéciale sera disponible sur certains marchés et comprendra une mini-figurine Python (Mark XX) en bonus.

L'armure Shotgun sera un ajout exceptionnel à toute collection Iron Man !

Caractéristiques spéciales de la figurine à collectionner Shotgun (Mark XL) à l'échelle 1/6 :

- Ressemblance authentique avec Shotgun (Mark XL), la combinaison de voyage à hyper vitesse, dans Iron Man 3
- Tête sculptée avec casque endommagé au combat, ressemblance authentique avec Robert Downey Jr. dans le rôle de Tony Stark dans le film et fonction d'éclairage LED (lumière blanche, fonctionne à piles)
- Hauteur d'environ 31 cm
- Plus de 30 points d'articulation
- Peinture métallique bleue et argentée sur l'armure
- Yeux éclairés par LED et RT rectangulaire sur la poitrine (lumière blanche, fonctionnant à piles)
- Un (1) masque interchangeable endommagé au combat
- Une (1) armure thoracique interchangeable endommagée au combat
- Une (1) armure de côte gauche interchangeable
- Deux (2) pièces d'armure de torse endommagées au combat interchangeables pour révéler le torse éclairé par LED (lumière bleue, fonctionnant à piles)
- Trois (3) paires de paumes interchangeables, comprenant :
- Une (1) paire de paumes avec doigts articulés et répulseurs lumineux (lumière blanche, fonctionnant à piles)
- Une (1) paire de poings
- Une (1) paire de paumes tirant des répulseurs (lumière blanche, fonctionnant à piles)
- Articulations améliorées au niveau du cou et de l'armure de la taille pour permettre des mouvements plus souples
- Chaque pièce de la sculpture de la tête est spécialement peinte à la main

Accessoires :
- Un (1) socle circulaire avec tige flexible

Date de sortie : deuxième ou troisième trimestre 2016

**Prototype présenté, le produit final peut être légèrement différent
**Les détails du produit peuvent être modifiés sans préavis
**Pile incluse pour la figurine de collection. Des piles boutons sont nécessaires

© 2015 Marvel.
© 2015 Hot Toys Limited. Tous droits réservés.
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 7415255444

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 8 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
X
Verified Purchase
xiwaeo
Pawtucket, US
★★★★★ 5
Great Read
Great book, I enjoyed reading it. I am non-lawyer so I spent time having to read and re-read sentences and paragraphs but darn good book. Highly recommend it. Sometimes a person can be in discussion with an official, doctor, lawyer, cop ..whatever--it helps to remember arguments made in this book. Most folks just try to explain a situation, heaven forbid standing in front of a court or judge in a legal matter. But, this type of reading builds confidence, a strong vocabulary and so forth. It matters most trying to persuade a person or an institution..just winning, making your point in a clear coherent and cognizant way. This book can teach you these things.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 20, 2025
J
Verified Purchase
Jeff Wade
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 4
You don't have to like Justice Scalia to like his book.
Perhaps an appellate brief that you wrote would have been perfect if only the judge had read it. The lesson you learned, hopefully, was that there is no guarantee that a judge will read your brief. The lesson you can learn from "Making Your Case" is how to write so that the judges will read what you wrote - preferably before your oral argument. Writing in a quite candid, lucid and entertaining style, Scalia and Garner serve up tips that even the most experienced lawyers can learn from. If you find yourself approaching the court's word limit, for example, you may be minimizing the chances of having your brief read, as judges really do favor brevity. How do you write for a court that is notoriously dismissive of higher court precedents? How do you best respond to a judge who asks whether you would be content with a remand? These and other critical questions are addressed simply yet insightfully. If your legal education stressed the IRAC approach (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion), Scalia and Garner take you a step further by stressing a syllogistic approach. Even if you have already been exposed to all the best ideas about persuading appellate judges, you are still likely to gain much rom reading "Making Your Case" because the authors organize all those ideas in a way that makes them much easier to remember and keep them in mind as you prepare your written and oral arguments. Justice Scalia calls his approach to legal reasoning and argument "textualism," which I understand to mean that his decisions are driven by the language of the law and of the case. My impression from reading many of his decisions is that he is often driven by ideology, so I can't quite square his book with his decisions. I also question the book's fundamental statement that the overriding objective of a brief is to make the court's job easier, as I prefer to write primarily for the purpose of winning the case. My criticisms of "Making Your Case" are miniscule compared to those thrown at it by Richard Posner. But although I find Judge Posner's decisions generally more fair than those of Justice Scalia, I prefer the clarity of Justice Scalia's writing - especially when he teams up with Bryan Garmer. Judge Posner notwithstanding, Scalia and Garner have put together a gem that is likely to prove invaluable for law students as well as for trial and appellate lawyers who are still interested in improving their game. If you fall into either category, buy this book, read it two or three times, and then keep it handy as a reference. It should help you make your case.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 18, 2012
F
Verified Purchase
Fig&Friday
Carnegie, US
★★★★★ 5
A Great Read... (for those in the legal field)
A great gift for those in the legal field. We ordered several for gifts throughout the year.. Made a great little gift basket with a bottle of whiskey :)
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 20, 2026
R
Verified Purchase
rbnn
Whiting, US
★★★★★ 5
Elegant, useful
Simply the best book on legal persuasive writing ever written. Interesting, useful, fun, full of great anecdotes. Terrific discussion of statutory interpretation. Great references to scholarly classical treatises on rhetoric. This book is wonderful both for its analysis of oral argument and for its discussion of written forms of persuasion, like briefs. I wish I had had it earlier. My only complaint is the same one I have with virtually all modern style manuals: they advocate a simplistic prose style, characterized by short, conversational sentences, avoiding unusual words, eschewing Latin phrases. But I personally often find prose that breaks these rules a refreshing change. I enjoy reading a word or phrase I rarely see but that is perfectly chosen. And I enjoy learning new words or phrases. This book would condemn two of the greatest legal prose stylists out there: John Marshall and Learned Hand, both of whose opinions often contained sentences that would not work so well conversationally, that were full of long, convoluted sentences and classical allusions. My sense is that in this joint work Justice Scalia, who can write rich and interesting prose, pushed back against some of the simplifying strictures of his co-author. Furthermore, I think that often too much emphasis on simple words and sentences serves to make more complex ideas too difficult to express or to understand. Thus, the book (like most books) argues against "jargon," but jargon, once learned, is often a much clearer way of expressing something than a rephrasing. And the Roe v. Wade anecdote is great! It explains a lot... In any case, I am hardly qualified to criticize Justice Scalia, whose writing is far beyond my own. Anyway, this is a great book.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 7, 2008
W
Verified Purchase
WANDA LEE CATALAN
Cuba, US
★★★★★ 5
Recomendado para todo estudiante de Derecho
Libro fácil de leer y fácil de comprender. Recomendado
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 2, 2026

recommand products