SKU: 78537429121

Sukhoi Su-27 Flanker-B Aircraft "Blue 388 Paris Air Show" (1989) Soviet Air Force 1/100 Diecast Model Airplane by Legion

Sale price$68.73 Regular price$76.37
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $19.09 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 23 - Aug 28

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Sukhoi Su-27 Flanker-B Aircraft "Blue 388 Paris Air Show" (1989) Soviet Air Force 1/100 Diecast Model Airplane by LegionBrand new 1 100 scale diecast airplane model of Sukhoi Su 27 Flanker B Aircraft "Blue 388, Paris Air Show" (1989) Soviet Air Force die cast model by Legion. Brand new box. Detailed exterior. True to scale detail. Comes with a display stand. This model does not have any openings. Manufacturer's original unopened packaging. Made of diecast metal with some plastic parts. Dimensions approximately Length 8. 75, Wingspan 5. 75 inches. Diecast metal and

  • Brand new 1/100 scale diecast airplane model of Sukhoi Su-27 Flanker-B Aircraft "Blue 388, Paris Air Show" (1989) Soviet Air Force die cast model by Legion.
  • Brand new box.
  • Detailed exterior.
  • True-to-scale detail.
  • Comes with a display stand.
  • This model does not have any openings.
  • Manufacturer's original unopened packaging.
  • Made of diecast metal with some plastic parts.
  • Dimensions approximately Length- 8.75, Wingspan- 5.75 inches.
  • Diecast metal and plastic construction for durability and a heavy, realistic feel.
  • It is a highly detailed and accurate model, perfect for collectors and enthusiasts of military history.
  • Realistic panel lines, antennas, access panels, and surface details for an authentic representation of the real-life airplane.
  • HISTORY ASPECTS:
  • The Sukhoi Su-27 Flanker-B “Blue 388” became one of the most iconic aircraft of the late Cold War when it appeared at the Paris Air Show in 1989. Operated by the Soviet Air Forces, the Sukhoi Su-27 was designed to counter advanced Western fighters and establish dominance in long-range air combat. By the late 1980s, the Su-27 represented the pinnacle of Soviet fighter design, combining powerful engines, advanced aerodynamics, and long-range missile capability.
  • At the 1989 Paris Air Show, “Blue 388” stunned international audiences with a demonstration that showcased the aircraft’s extraordinary maneuverability. The highlight was the now-famous “Cobra maneuver,” in which the aircraft briefly pitches its nose to an extremely high angle of attack before recovering to level flight. This dramatic display of control at low speeds challenged Western assumptions about Soviet aircraft performance and demonstrated the Flanker’s ability to outmaneuver opponents in close-in dogfights. The appearance of the Su-27 at a Western airshow marked a significant moment of openness during the final years of the Cold War, offering a rare glimpse into Soviet aviation technology.
  • Although “Blue 388” itself was a demonstration aircraft, the Su-27 platform it represented was deeply tied to Cold War operational tensions. Soviet Flankers were routinely tasked with intercepting NATO aircraft and defending vast airspace across Eastern Europe and the Arctic. While not engaged in direct large-scale conflict during that era, the aircraft was part of the broader strategic confrontation between East and West, maintaining readiness in what can be considered a continuous geopolitical standoff. In later years, Su-27 variants would go on to serve in post-Soviet conflicts, but during the 1980s, their primary mission was deterrence and air superiority.
  • This 1:100 scale model is a must-have for collectors of iconic aviation moments. Featuring accurate markings and the sleek, powerful lines of the Flanker, it captures the aircraft that amazed the world with its Cobra maneuver. Perfect for display, this replica celebrates a turning point in aviation history; add it to your collection today for a bold and unforgettable centerpiece.
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 78537429121

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 24 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
C
Verified Purchase
C. Witt
Dallas, US
★★★★★ 4
Heavy Duty Paper Towel Holder
Color: Brushed Nickel, Material Type: Stainless Steel, Color: Brushed Nickel, Material Type: Stainless Steel
Nice looking, heavy duty paper towel holder. Looks like it'll be durable. The top did have a couple of dark, tarnished looking spots but it's not too noticeable.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 2, 2023
H
Verified Purchase
Hunter Hart
Dallas, US
★★★★★ 5
Free Mini-Screwdriver + microfiber cloth? Thank you
Color: Gold, Material Type: Stainless Steel
100% worth the purchase mainly for the little screwdriver (a real one, just small) and microfiber cloth included. As long as you install it correctly it all holds together very well.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 18, 2026
C
Verified Purchase
Connie
Charlottesville, US
★★★★★ 5
Love it
Color: Brushed Nickel, Material Type: Stainless Steel
I love it. It holds the jumbo rolls and that makes it a perfect kitchennitem
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 28, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Mr. Douglas
Waukegan, US
★★★★★ 5
The Best Book on the Creation-Evolution Debate
Format: Paperback
“The book The Evolution of Adam is an accessible study of the hermeneutical issues involved in reading Genesis and Paul on Adam in view of evolution.” - Peter Enns In my opinion The Evolution of Adam by Peter Enns is the best book available on the evolution versus creation debate because it goes right to the heart of the matter. Christians grossly misunderstand the creation stories in Genesis because they read them from a modern point of view. The first part of the book deals with Adam in Genesis. The second part of the book deals with Paul's Adam in Romans. The book is short and very well written for the popular audience. PART 1 ADAM IN GENESIS Many stories in the Old Testament have parallels with other Ancient Near Eastern stories. The Adam story is no different as it has strong similarities to Atrahasis. If I may quote Enns, “Israel's creation story was written to say something about their place in the world and the God they worshiped. To think that the Israelites, alone among all other ancient peoples, were interested in (or capable of) giving some definitive, quasi-scientific, account of human origins is an absurd logic. And to read the story of Adam and Eve as if it were set up to so such a thing is simply wrongheaded. It strains credulity to think that, of all the ancient peoples with origins stories, Israel alone escaped this story-telling mentality and gave us something approximating 'history' or 'science' in the modern sense.” The Evolution of Adam shows conclusively that, “the Adam story in Genesis is part of Israel’s literature of national and religious self-definition, not the origin of humanity.” The Adam story is not concerned with human origins as most Christians assume. Adam is Israel. Israel’s history as a nation can be broken down as follows:   1. Israel is “created” by God at the exodus through a cosmic battle (gods are defeated and the Red Sea is “divided”);   2. The Israelites are given Canaan to inhabit, a lush land flowing with milk and honey;   3. They remain in the land as long as they obey the Mosaic law;   4. They persist in a pattern of disobedience and are exiled to Babylon. Israel’s history parallels Adam’s drama in Genesis:   1. Adam is created in Genesis 2 after the taming of chaos in Genesis 1;   2. Adam is placed in a lush garden;   3. Law (not to eat of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil) is given as a stipulation for remaining in the garden;   4. Adam and Eve disobey and are exiled. PART 2 PAUL'S ADAM Paul’s use of the Adam story, like Paul’s other uses of the Old Testament, is marked by creativity and the prior conviction that Jesus is God’s unexpected solution to a universal plight. Enns' summary of Paul's Adam in Romans 5:12-21 is as follows: 1. Adam is hardly mentioned in the Old Testament. 2. Some see Noah, Abraham, Moses, and David as “new Adams.” Paul represents Jesus as a new Adam. 3. The Fall of man is not taught in the Old Testament. 4. The Fall of man is not taught in the Garden scene. The imputation of Adam’s sin is not taught in the garden story. 5. The Adam/Jesus Parallel in Romans 5 is both clear and not so clear. What does Paul mean when he says that through Adam’s sin, “death came to all, because all sinned.” One might have expected Paul to say, “because Adam sinned” (death is Adam’s fault). 6. Paul’s Jesus/Adam parallel does not stem from a “plain reading” of Genesis. It is selective and theologically driven. The Book of Romans is not about personal salvation, but about the Jew/Gentile relationship. 7. Paul was an ancient man and he had an ancient view of human origins. 8. Paul used the Old Testament in creative ways that violate the grammatical-historical-contextual approach. So he could be doing the same with Adam. 9. Adam was used creatively in Second Temple Jewish literature (Paul’s contemporaries). CONCLUSION Evolution and creation are not in conflict because the early chapters of Genesis have nothing to do with HOW God created the world or the first humans. Therefore science can be studied freely for what it is and the Old Testament can be understood as ancient Israel's story. If I may quote Enns again, “The root of the conflict over evolution and creation for many Christians is not scientific or even theological, but group identity and fear of losing what it offers. The challenge of evolution is here to stay, and its effect on how Christians read Genesis and Paul must be addressed deliberately.” “Evangelicals tend to focus on how to protect the Bible against the attacks of evolution. The real challenge before them is to reorient their expectation of what the story of Adam and Eve is actually prepared to deliver.” If you are looking to solve the evolution-creation debate in your mind then the Evolution of Adam is the book to read. Evolution and creation are both true. God created through evolution. The Bible is not a modern science book.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 15, 2012
W
Verified Purchase
William M. Victor
Louisville, US
★★★★★ 4
Thoughtful book on the purpose of the Creation accounts
Format: Paperback
This book provides a very good introduction into how the Old Testament (Hebrew Bible) was most likely formed. It takes very seriously the environment that may have shaped the Pentateuch. It also provides a good primer into how Paul read the Hebrew Bible: through the lens of the death and resurrection of Jesus. If the reader of the Bible understands the purpose behind the creation narratives then there appears to be less conflict with scientific explanations for the origins of the universe and even humanity. I was expecting this book to do something that Enns never claims he was setting out to do, that is give an alternative understanding of the origins of sin and death while taking Paul's account in Romans 5 seriously. Enns claims that Paul interpreted the Adam story in a way that he interpreted other accounts of the Hebrew Bible, through a Christological lens but with little regard to historical context. To Enns, Paul was a man of his time and just because Paul, a man uninformed by scientific explanations of the universe, understood Adam as a historical person doesn't mean those of us who are informed need to see it the same way. Enns values Paul's Christocentric lens on the Hebrew Bible, but comes just short of calling Paul wrong on his understanding of the origin of sin and death. If you are working through the issue of integration/synthesizing scientific thoughts on the origins of the universe and humanity (as well as trying to come to grips with the purpose of the Creation accounts in Genesis) this book will serve you well. If you are expecting Enns to provide that integration/synthesis for you, you will be disappointed.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 3, 2012

recommand products