Pay in installments of $299.99 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 28 - Aug 2
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
1955-1957 One-Fifty Series SS4+ Brake System Rear 4302429FRFits 1955 57 Chevy Full Size Passenger Cars w OE Bearing on Axle (BOA) Housing Ends Features: 2 Piece, 4 Piston, S4 Caliper Manufactured in Phoenix, AZ CNC Machined from US Sourced Forged or Billet Aluminum Powder Coated Finish Hard Anodized Aluminum Pistons, Stainless Steel Abutments and Noise Suppression Clips Dual Seals, Dust Weather & Pressure 2 Piece Slot, Drilled, Zinc Plate Rotor w Billet Aluminum Hat Specs: Applications Chevy Full Size Pass
Fits 1955-57 Chevy Full Size Passenger Cars w/OE Bearing on Axle (BOA) Housing Ends
Features:
- 2-Piece, 4-Piston, S4 Caliper Manufactured in Phoenix, AZ
- CNC Machined from US Sourced Forged or Billet Aluminum
- Powder Coated Finish
- Hard Anodized Aluminum Pistons, Stainless Steel Abutments and Noise Suppression Clips
- Dual Seals, Dust/Weather & Pressure
- 2-Piece Slot, Drilled, Zinc-Plate Rotor w/Billet Aluminum Hat
Specs:
| Applications | Chevy Full Size Pass Cars 55-57 |
|---|---|
| Axle | Rear |
| Brand | Baer Brakes |
| Caliper | S4 |
| Caliper Color | Fire Red |
| Disc Brake Caliper (Rear) Piston Quantity | 4 |
| Disc Brake Caliper (Rear) Type | Fixed |
| Disc Brake Pad FMSI Number | DR1-C |
| Disc Brake Rotor (Rear) Construction | Vented |
| Disc Brake Rotor (Rear) Outside Diameter | 13.000IN |
| Emission Code | 6 |
| Export Description | Brake Components |
| Fitment Notes | w/OE Bearing on Axle (BOA) Housing Ends |
| Grade Type | Performance |
| Hose Material | Stainless Steel |
| Includes Park Brake | Yes |
| Includes Park Brake Cables | Yes |
| Lug Count | 5 Lug |
| Min Wheel Dia (verify using template) | 17IN |
| Product Line | 13 Inch SS4+ |
| Product Type | 13 Inch SS4+ Rear Brake Kit |
| Prop 65 (C, R or CR) | CR |
| Prop 65 - Long Label | WARNING: This product can expose you to chemicals including Toluene Diisocyanate, and Nickel which are known to the State of California to cause cancer. For more information, visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov |
| Prop 65 - Short Label | WARNING: Cancer and Reproductive Harm. www.P65Warnings.ca.gov |
| Prop 65 Yes/No | Yes |
| Rotor Thickness | .810IN |
| Rotor Type | 2-Piece |
| Surface Type | Slotted, Drilled & Zinc Plated |
| System Notes | For stock bearing on axle rear end |
| Template | S135H |
| Title | SS4+ Brake System Rear |
| Wheel Lug/Bolt Pattern | 5x4.75 |
Application:
| Year | Make | Model | Submodel |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1955-1957 | Chevrolet | One-Fifty Series | |
| 1955-1957 | Chevrolet | Two-Ten Series | |
| 1955-1957 | Chevrolet | Bel Air | Base |
| 1955-1957 | Chevrolet | Bel Air | Nomad |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.1 ★★★★★
Based on 9 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 4
Nice gold paper towel holder on a budget
Color: Gold-aa
For a less expensive option I was please with the assembly and the look. It did come a little scratched but mostly in hidden spots and for the price, can’t be beat. It is not super heavy feeling though, so if you want a really solid heavy holder this might disappoint, however I like that feature since I don’t want heavy things scratching and breaking my counter or tile floor. It doesn’t wobble and I like the color so I am mostly pleased, only giving it a little less of a review because it did come a little scratched
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 1, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Does the job.
Works as a paper towel holder. Its a stick. It doesnt look like a cheap stick and it didn't break. Which means it met all my criteria. Great job.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 3, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Nice product
Color: Gold-aa
when having guests over, it's nice for each one to use their own towel instead of having a 'community' guest towel, or those fancy ones that people feel guilty using. This solved the problem.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 7, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Rich
Format: Paperback
A wonderful book that illuminates the reality of the God of Israel compared to the ANE deities.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 28, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Excellent. An invaluable resource!
Format: Paperback
Recently I have been reading a lot of books that have told me that the Bible's story of Adam and Eve plus the Exodus etc. are all myths that are extremely similar. Therefore, we should rethink the Bible and change our understanding of it to a more modern worldview that incorporates this knowledge and denies any sort of originality in the biblical account. John Oswalt thinks differently. He thinks that the Genesis story of origins is not some random piece of Semitic or Mesopotamian literature, but that is really unique revelation from God (and is prepared to back that statement up!).
The book is divided into two sections:
The Bible and Myth
The Bible and History
Oswalt spends the first few chapters defining the world of the Old Testament and trying to find a definition for the word myth. He comes to the conclusion that a myth "the reflection of a certain way of thinking about the world. To be sure, because of the way in which it thinks, the fantastic is often found in myth. But it is not the presence of the fantastic that makes a piece of literature myth; rather, it is the presence of the mythic worldview." This worldview, he asserts, is based off of what he calls "continuity," which he describes as "when the human, natural, and divine realms are expressed and actualized [together]." The worldview that assumes continuity is based on the here and now, and is very panentheistic. Primordial time is a key factor and the gods are dependent on the humans. This is not so with the biblical worldview. The worldview of the Bible assumes transcendence - an independent God meeting with people on his own terms. He then compares and contrasts these views and shows the real differences between stories like Enimu Elish and Genesis 1. He doesn't deny similarities in the narratives, but he shows the differences in the worldviews.
He then moves on to history. Just like the word "myth," Oswalt has to define history, because how civilizations have viewed history in the past has never been the same as Western civilization views history. Then he asks whether or not the Bible is history, and whether or not it matters. He makes several great points here, one of which is that ancient annuals and chronicles never recorded the defeats of kings, yet we find Israel's holy book littered with their failures and mess ups. This is a serious deal when looking at whether or not the Bible is history, because in the ancient way of thinking this surely stands out. He then looks at other questions, like "Are Biblical Faith and Biblical History Inseparable?" and responds to some critics (including Bultmann!).
He then looks into the origins of the Israelites' worldview by means of authorship. Is the Bible a late text that was updated from an older, polytheistic one? "No!" says Oswalt. He deals with critiques here as well before moving on to a brilliant conclusion where he sums up the book and gives us a view of how modernism and rationalism are taking us back to the worldview based on continuity.
Overall, this was a brilliant book and I wish I had read it sooner!!! It seems like so many authors today are trying to convince us that the Bible has so much in common with the other stories of origin out of an anti-biblical or liberal worldview (like
). However, under close scrutiny these criticisms do not stand up. I thank John for this book, and I will be recommending it to countless others!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 11, 2012