Pay in installments of $32.49 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 2 - Aug 7
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Fits Ford F-250 4WD (1980-1996) M1 Rear Shocks; 2.5-6"; 770864_AM1 Rear Shocks 2. 5 6" Ford F 250 4WD (1980 1996) Whether you're tackling tough terrain or smooth city streets, Rough Country's Nitrogen charged M1 Monotube Shock Absorber leads the way, delivering impeccable ride quality and performance mile after mile. Rough Country's Monotube M1 Shocks feature an internal floating piston design that keeps the shock oil and high pressure nitrogen separate. The result is a lightning fast reaction with no cavitation
M1 Rear Shocks - 2.5-6" - Ford F-250 4WD (1980-1996)
Whether you're tackling tough terrain or smooth city streets, Rough Country's Nitrogen-charged M1 Monotube Shock Absorber leads the way, delivering impeccable ride quality and performance mile after mile. Rough Country's Monotube M1 Shocks feature an internal floating piston design that keeps the shock oil and high-pressure nitrogen separate. The result is a lightning-fast reaction with no cavitation - just unbridled vibration damping at each and every obstacle. The M1 Monotube Shock Absorber is more than an upgrade - it's a true performance shock. Each shock features a steel body that is brushed and glavanized boasting a passivation sealing technology that is sure to withstand the elements. The internal 46mm digressive piston offers countless years of durability. The M1 is designed to be mounted body-up for a more interesting look on the vehicle.
Features:
- 2-inch seamless extruded tube
- Free Shipping 3-year Manufacturer's Warranty
- 46mm digressive piston
- Self-adjusting, deflective-disc independent rebound and compression
- 18mm centerless-ground, case-hardened, chromed, and super-polished rod
- 46mm monotube design ensures consistent, fade-free performance in all conditions
- Digressive valving instantly reacts to changing surface conditions
- Zinc plated for resistance against harsh elements
- Available in various lift heights for multiple applications
- Durable vulcanized natural rubber bushings
Application:
| Year | Make | Model | Submodel |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1983-1997 | Ford | F-350 | Base |
| 1982-1997 | Ford | F-350 | XL |
| 1983-1997 | Ford | F-350 | XLT |
| 1995-1996 | Ford | F-250 | Eddie Bauer |
| 1995-1996 | Ford | F-350 | Special |
| 1995-1996 | Ford | F-250 | Special |
| 1982-1996 | Ford | F-250 | XL |
| 1983-1996 | Ford | F-250 | XLT |
| 1995-1995 | Ford | F-350 | Eddie Bauer |
| 1980-1992 | Ford | F-250 | Custom |
| 1982-1992 | Ford | F-350 | Custom |
| 1982-1992 | Ford | F-350 | XLT Lariat |
| 1982-1992 | Ford | F-250 | XLT Lariat |
| 1983-1986 | Ford | F-250 | Base |
| 1982-1983 | Ford | F-350 | XLS |
| 1982-1983 | Ford | F-250 | XLS |
| 1980-1981 | Ford | F-250 | Ranger |
| 1980-1981 | Ford | F-250 | Ranger Lariat |
| 1980-1981 | Ford | F-250 | Ranger XLT |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 27 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 1
Poor quality switches
Main power switch didn’t work and since I didn’t get a chance to install when I ordered it, I can’t return it! Once again Amazon gets my money.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 28, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Highly recommended
This is the BEST harness for side shooters lights . I just wish the switch would light up but Awsome harness
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 8, 2023
★★★★★ 5
Can't ask for more from a 7.1 or 5.1.2 receiver
Style: Receiver, Style: Receiver
My previous Yamaha receiver was 10 ys old, and was an entry level 5.1 model (RX-V373). I accidentally fried it by putting my phone's USB connector in. I have been wanting to upgrade for a while the last few yrs but waited it out until receivers have 8k pass through (so whenever 8k becomes more of a thing I can keep this new one a bit longer). The 3773 had 4k pass through when I got it 10 yrs ago, well before 4k became as available as it is now for example, which was one reason I held out on replacing as long as I did. This time around I decided to step up into the premium Aventage line of Yamaha. It was between this & the A4A, not a huge price difference, but I would have needed to replace my entertainment center since the A4A is too deep to fit. Didn't seem worth it & now I'm really happy with my choice. My living room set up (in a condo) has 2 surrounds, to add 2 more would require building mounts on the wall (couch is against the wall with 2 surrounds on side tables) which I don't want. This has 7 channels to allow for 2 Atmos front firing speakers which I got & love how immersive it sounds. Bi-amping the front towers is an option, but that uses 2 extra channels so the Atmos front speakers can't be connected at the same time as bi-amping. I experimented with biamping & biwiring & couldn't hear any difference so I have the fronts biwired, allowing for the 2 Atmos front connections. New features/improvements from my old receiver include more power/watts, lower THD & better sound, streaming music directly from the receiver with Music Cast, and it processes Atmos & DTS audio. One key feature all the Aventage models have that the RX ones don't is the 5th foot in the middle, which was designed & tested to improve the sound with more stabilization. Aventage also has a 3 yr warranty (vs 2 for RX). The top of the line RX model looks identical in specs which I also considered but it just sounds like this 1st Aventage model is slightly better with it its parts & sound quality, and not that much more. Especially since I got the A2A on sale for 999.95 (vs the 1200 price). I actually bought this for 1150 which was a teeny mark down, and then saw Amazon put it on sale for 999.95 shortly after (about 2 weeks). Amazon customer service was great when I called about that, and they credited the difference. Back to the receiver...2 subwoofers can be connected, and an amplifier for the 2 front speakers can be connected as well through pre outs. Probably more improvements but those are the main ones. Along with this receiver upgrade, I also upgraded my subwoofer & added a Nvidia Shield Pro streamer (due to it handling Atmos & 4k upscaling of lower hd content, which my Roku Ultra cannot do). My system now includes Polk TSI 400 front towers Polk CS20 center, Polk T15 surrounds (all of these Polk speakers are from 10 yrs ago as well & still work great for me, they sound better too with this receiver). I added Klipsch R-41SA Atmos front firing speakers, and upgraded from a Polk PSW505 subwoofer to an SVS SB3000 (night & day difference with that upgrade!). Have a Roku Ultra from a few yrs ago, and the Nvidia as well now. The TV also will be upgraded at some point, but I'm perfectly content with it now (is a 7 yrs old 55 inch 4K Sony Bravia). This receiver also processes Dolby Vision which I'd need a new TV for, as well as eArc which this receiver also has. Over time I will continue adding to my set up. A decent record player is next, and a current blu ray player (the one I have is rather old & only has 1080p). Then a new TV & A 2nd sub (will get another SVS SB3000). The last & most expensive upgrade will be the rest of the speakers. From Polk to B&W most likely, but when I get to this I will compare both at the same price point as I am still very impressed with the quality of my Polks for their price point. I also plan to add an amp (Emotiva most likely) to power the fronts. Another reason I was ok with the A2A watts per channel for now (100 with 2 channels driven for music, unsure what it is at 5.1.2 but it's plenty especially with the thunder the SVS sub provides even at low volumes, and the ability to boost dialogue in addition to the center channel. I'd rather get a dedicated amp for more music power than a higher priced receiver just due to more watts. Very pricey to do all of this at once (in particular the speakers & amp), but for now I am thrilled with how much better everything sounds with these phase 1 upgrades. Highly recommend it, if you are coming from an entry level budget receiver this can pump more life into your current speakers.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 17, 2023
★★★★★ 5
Sounds fantastic and easy to operate
Style: Receiver
I used to sell home audio equipment a long time ago and I love this unit! Nice & clean look, the layout for inputs/output is standard and easy to see and the remote makes sense...well, to me it does lol. I had purchased an O***o unit because it's been good brand for a while...returned it because it was defective but I didn't care for it (you had to be a real audiophile to get into the setup and who has time for that?). The Yamaha is easy to work with and sounds fantastic. Make sure you don't go cheap on the speakers!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 30, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Great when on sale
Style: Receiver
Update: I got a new Sony X90L TV and this receiver just doesn't like that TV or something. I've had at least 4 instances where the TV said there was no signal. The receiver was on and the proper input was selected. If I hit the menu button on the receiver, I could see that. No inputs on the receiver would work. Unplugging the power from the receiver and plugging it back in fixes the problem in every case. Based on my googling, many others have similar problems.
Yamaha receivers are generally over priced I've noticed. And they seem to skimp on features, e.g. a receiver with an MSRP of $1000 doesn't have a single analog video input. I got this on sale for $650 and for that I'm quite happy. I had a Denon that I got pretty inexpensively, but I hated the Denon. Things didn't work, it was confusing, didn't sound all that good and didn't do HDMI input switching well. The Yamaha is a far better reliever in every way. It does cost quite a bit more but it's just so much nicer.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 14, 2024