Pay in installments of $374.99 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 1 - Aug 6
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
1979-1992 Mustang Pro+ Brake System Rear 4262290RFits 1979 92 Ford Mustang w OE Ford 8. 8" C clip Rear End (4 Lug) Features: 2 Piece, 6 Piston, 6P Caliper Manufactured in Phoenix, AZ CNC Machined from US Sourced Forged or Billet Aluminum Powder Coated Finish Stainless Steel Pistons, Abutments and Noise Suppression Clips Staggered Pistons to Minimize Uneven Pad Wear Dual Seals, Dust Weather & Pressure 2 Piece Slot, Drilled, Zinc Plate Rotor w Billet Aluminum Hat Specs: Applications Ford Mustang 79 92
Fits 1979-92 Ford Mustang w/OE Ford 8.8" C-clip Rear End (4 Lug)
Features:
- 2-Piece, 6-Piston, 6P Caliper Manufactured in Phoenix, AZ
- CNC Machined from US Sourced Forged or Billet Aluminum
- Powder Coated Finish
- Stainless Steel Pistons, Abutments and Noise Suppression Clips
- Staggered Pistons to Minimize Uneven Pad Wear
- Dual Seals, Dust/Weather & Pressure
- 2-Piece Slot, Drilled, Zinc-Plate Rotor w/Billet Aluminum Hat
Specs:
| Applications | Ford Mustang 79-92 |
|---|---|
| Axle | Rear |
| Axle Standoff | 2.50IN |
| Brand | Baer Brakes |
| Caliper | 6P |
| Caliper Color | Red |
| Disc Brake Caliper (Rear) Piston Quantity | 6 |
| Disc Brake Caliper (Rear) Type | Floating |
| Disc Brake Pad FMSI Number | D0731 |
| Disc Brake Rotor (Rear) Construction | Vented |
| Disc Brake Rotor (Rear) Outside Diameter | 13.000IN |
| Emission Code | 6 |
| Export Description | Brake Components |
| Fitment Notes | w/OE Ford 8.8 C-clip Rear End (4 Lug) |
| Grade Type | Performance |
| Hose Material | Stainless Steel |
| Includes Park Brake | Yes |
| Includes Park Brake Cables | Yes |
| Lug Count | 4 Lug |
| Min Wheel Dia (verify using template) | 17IN |
| Product Line | 13 Inch Pro+ |
| Product Type | 13 Inch Pro+ Rear Brake Kit |
| Prop 65 (C, R or CR) | CR |
| Prop 65 - Long Label | WARNING: This product can expose you to chemicals including Toluene Diisocyanate, and Nickel which are known to the State of California to cause cancer. For more information, visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov |
| Prop 65 - Short Label | WARNING: Cancer and Reproductive Harm. www.P65Warnings.ca.gov |
| Prop 65 Yes/No | Yes |
| Rotor Thickness | 1.100IN |
| Rotor Type | 2-Piece |
| Surface Type | Slotted, Drilled & Zinc Plated |
| System Notes | Fits 79-92 Mustang (Fox) with OE 8.8" c-clip rear end & 4 lug axles (Master cylinder upgrade is recommended, see Note below) |
| Template | Q085H |
| Title | Pro+ Brake System Rear |
| Wheel Lug/Bolt Pattern | 4x4.25 |
Application:
| Year | Make | Model | Submodel |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1979-1992 | Ford | Mustang |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 23 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Bueno
Cumplió su propósito
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 16, 2026
★★★★★ 1
Don't waste your money.
Instead of buying one from the local auto store, thought I'd save money and get this. Bad choice. Installed it and it didn't work. Took it to the auto shop to be tested and they said it didn't work. Cheap imitation of the the real thing.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 4, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Good value
Size: 5 Quart Jug
Very good fluid, worked great in a 2016 Honda Civic 2.0.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 5, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Exceeds performance expectations of OEM fluids
Size: 5 Quart Jug
You know I didn't think it would work as well I've heard all these horror stories but you know what this works better than the factory CVT fluid this stuff is great this is amazing be very careful to get your levels correct that goes without saying with any transmission but once you do that this fluid is amazing I have a better performance than when I had the new transmission I serve my CvT 35 to 40,000 miles I'm using it in a 2018 Mitsubishi outlander base model and I'm also running Yokohama geolander 015s on it. If you worry about tires for you Mitsubishi or any vehicle. I'm going to say you'll call when you lander whether it's a car or crossover or an SUV this tire is amazing it's best all around tire and your rain traction is phenomenal
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 9, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Good Stuff!! All low speed shudder is gone.
Size: 5 Quart Jug
I have a 2020 Nissan Altima SL 2.5l and Nissan is VERY specific about using ONLY NS3 transmission fluid. There are only a couple NS3 transmission fluid manufacturers...Nissan NS3 (Manufactured by Idemitsu), Idemitsu (a little cheaper than Nissan dealer), Triax, and Mannol (works good too).
Seeing as Nissan is still using Jatco CVT transmissions which are known to be very troublesome, and very expensive to replace I wouldn't try any of the so-called "universal" transmission fluids just to save $50 and end up replacing a $6000 transmission.
The Triax fluid seems to work very good in my car. I don't feel the shutter that I normally feel when driving slow and need to accelerate. The shudder is completely gone and operating smooth.
The old fluid had 50k miles and it was very dirty but didn't smell burnt.
I ended up doing 2 - 3 1/2 quart changes with 200 miles between the first and second change.
I plan on doing another 3.5/4 quart change every 15k miles since there is no way to completely drain the 7.4 quarts of transmission fluid. The first change, only 3.5 quarts drained from the pan.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 19, 2025