SKU: 60722633925

1815 Directory of Virginia Landowners: Giles County, Virginia

Sale price$11.69 Regular price$12.99
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $3.25 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 31 - Aug 5

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

1815 Directory of Virginia Landowners: Giles County, VirginiaThis is the Giles County, Virginia entry in the series of 1815 Virginia Landowners Booklets. It's an alphabetical listing of all 1815 landowners found in this county, as well as the accompanying description of the location of said property. A helpful resource for Virginia genealogy! About this series: In 1782 the General Assembly of Virginia enacted new tax laws which created within each county an enumeration of land and certain personal property.

This is the Giles County, Virginia entry in the series of 1815 Virginia Landowners Booklets. It's an alphabetical listing of all 1815 landowners found in this county, as well as the accompanying description of the location of said property. A helpful resource for Virginia genealogy!

About this series:

In 1782 the General Assembly of Virginia enacted new tax laws which created within each county an enumeration of land and certain personal property. These early land tax laws required a tax commissioner in each district of a county to record a list of the names of persons owning land or town lots, the quantity of land owned and its value, and the amount of tax owed. By 1813, a brief geographic description (usually citing an adjacent stream, road, or other landmark) was required; in 1814, the distance and direction from the courthouse for each parcel was also added to the tax rolls.

The present work is an alphabetical listing of all 1815 landowners found in each county, as well as the accompanying description of the location of the said property. We have not included the number of acres, taxes assessed, or any transactions between landowners which may have been noted on the tax rolls; also, in many cases the geographic location was provided as "adjacent to John Smith", etc. and, while useful many times to a genealogist, was considered to be beyond the objectives of this project. The reader is encouraged to consider the information here-in as an "outline" of early landowners in Virginia rather than a "text" due to the year-to-year variation in information provided to the clerk (or recorded by the clerk), omissions, lack of "identifiers" to determine if "same name" was also "same person" within a district or across districts, marginal quality/clarity (in a few cases) of the microfilm copy, and, not least, errors on the part of either the original clerks or the current author while transcribing.

Some of the approaches to utilizing the 1815 landowner information include:

  • observe distinct clusters of the same surname within a county in order to clarify the common surnames such as "Smith", "Anderson", etc;
  • identify non-resident landowners and their county (or state) of residence (these people often being former residents of the current county);
  • determine neighbors with different surnames (often being relatives);
  • use the 1815 information as a "bridge" from the 18th and 19th century deed/will books to the 17th and 18th century land grants/patents in the county;
  • evaluate the 1810 to 1840 census information which generally grouped neighbors;
  • substitute this information for missing deed/will books in the "burned" counties; and, clarify/enhance vague deed/will information in the counties with more complete records. 

FORMAT OF PRESENTATION: Each entry is listed as: Surname, name, personal identifiers (if any); location/place-name of land; miles/direction from the 1815 courthouse. If multiple owners are listed for a property, the listing is duplicated under each of the owner's surnames (i.e "Smith and Brown" is also listed as "Brown, --see Smith"); when multiple owners share a common surname, the property is only listed once. When a landowner had land at more than one location/place-name, the miles/direction listing for each parcel is in the same sequence as the location listing (i.e. James RV, Slate CK; 12N, 5SW.). In the few cases where a landowner had "many" parcels, the miles/direction notation is attached to the location listing (i.e. Sandy RV- 5NE, Willow CK-7S, etc.)

(Sample page is from Orange Co., VA 1815 Directory of Landowners)

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 60722633925

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 15 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
L
Verified Purchase
Luis s.
Grantham, US
★★★★★ 5
Buen producto
Color: Upgraded Version - Gray
Execelente
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 15, 2025
A
Amazon Customer
Fort Morgan, US
★★★★★ 5
Mag-Safe Magnetic
Great product! The MagSafe compatibility is perfect—it snaps right on instantly. I prefer this over the wireless charging mounts because those always seem to overheat my phone on long trips. This is lightweight, stable, and the all-black aesthetic blends right into the Tesla screen frame. 10/10 for any Tesla owner.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 15, 2026
S
SuperBanker
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 4
Perfect Little Mount for Tesla Drivers
I like that this Tesla phone mount snaps onto the back of the screen cleanly and holds my iPhone with a strong MagSafe grip. It keeps the phone right where I need it without blocking the view, and the adjustable angle makes navigation super easy to see while driving. I do not like that it can wobble a tiny bit on rough roads, and the magnet isn’t as strong if you’re using a thicker case. Overall, a great accessory that makes the Model 3/Y setup even more convenient!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 14, 2025
P
photogirl5
Phoenix, US
★★★★★ 5
Tesla MagSafe mount for phone
Very cool phone mount that I hadn’t thought to purchase until I saw it as an option on Vine. Easy to install using the included adhesive strips pre-attached to the mount. It has a nice firm grip on the MagSafe for the phone and the mount itself sticks very well to the back of the Tesla screen with no issues. It is in the perfect location in the dashboard area as it doesn’t block any view or buttons. No negative aspects to my experience with this product.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 21, 2025
J
J. Youm
New York, US
★★★★★ 4
Arm can be positioned in many ways, but doesn't grip as hard and the phone rattles in rough roads
I liked how this product looked in the picture so I ordered it. But when I installed it, I found out that it doesn't have the same amount of "grip power" because you have to turn a little knob on the side to tighten the grip and it's not that easy to do compared to other screw type phone mounts that have bigger screws. The magnet was slightly weaker than my existing phone holder but it was adequately strong. It was good to see how one could position the phone in different positions due to the way the arm is designed to be moved and adjusted. But the one biggest thing I didn't like is how the phone kept on shaking/rattling when I drove over rough roads. The metal arm is quite thin and although it's metal and not plastic, due to the thinness of the material, it was easily rattled and made the phone rattle a lot in return. Over smooth roads this won't be a big problem though. I wasn't quite satisfied with this, although it's adequately good enough.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 3, 2025

recommand products