Pay in installments of $190.59 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 27 - Aug 1
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
23052 be xl k c4 fagTechnische Basisdaten Hersteller: FAG Abdichtung: beidseitig Synonym: 0614931550040 23052 BE K C4 Auendurchmesser: 400 mm ueres Breitenma: 104 mm Gewicht: 50000 Gramm Herstellungsland: Deutschland Innendurchmesser: 260 mm Zolltarifnummer: 8482 3000 Erweiterte technische Daten ueres Breitenmae: mm 400,00 BE Maximum Capacity Design Begrenzungsdrehzahl (n G) "1850. 0000" ueres Breitenmae: mm 104,00 ueres Breitenmae: mm 104,00 C4 Bearing Internal
Technische Basisdaten
| Hersteller: FAG |
| Abdichtung: beidseitig |
| Synonym: 0614931550040 23052-BE-K-C4 |
| Außendurchmesser: 400 mm |
| Äußeres Breitenmaß: 104 mm |
| Gewicht: 50000 Gramm |
| Herstellungsland: Deutschland |
| Innendurchmesser: 260 mm |
| Zolltarifnummer: 8482 3000 |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 400,00 |
| BE Maximum Capacity Design |
| Begrenzungsdrehzahl (n G) "1850.0000" |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 104,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 104,00 |
| C4 Bearing Internal Clearance Greater Than C3 |
| ECLASS number 23-05-09-11 |
| ECLASS2 number 23-05-09-11 |
| Einzelgewicht in (kg): 49.5 |
| Innenmaße: mm 260,00 |
| Interne Radialluft C4 Innenluft (größer als C3) |
| Radial Dynamic Load Rating Cr (N) 1670000 |
| Radial Static Load Rating C0r (N) 2600000 |
| Referenzdrehzahl (n ϑr) "1170.0000" |
| Schwingsiebausführung Keine Schwingsiebausführung |
| XL X-Life |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 17 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Fit great
Size: Large, Color: (100) White / White / Halo Gray
Been a couple of months and they seem to be holding up nicely. Real picky about fit of socks and these fit well. They are very thin but very comfortable.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 21, 2024
★★★★★ 5
Always a win
Size: Large, Color: (001) Black / Black / Castlerock
Under armor is always a win! Comfortable, no peeling, true to size, no squeezing around the arch of foot & affordable.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 4, 2026
★★★★★ 4
Fit well and stay up
Size: Large, Color: (299) City Khaki / City Khaki / White
They're a little thin, so good mainly for warmer months. But they fit very well and I've not experienced any slippage
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 17, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Llego a tiempo
Size: X-Large, Color: (001) Black / Black / Castlerock
Bien
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 28, 2026
★★★★★ 3
Low quality socks.
Size: Large, Color: (001) Black / Black / Castlerock
I have been buying Under Armour undergarments for years and have noticed a steady decline in quality. These socks are no different. I purchased another six packs of very similar styled Under Armour socks in 2023 and recently they have started wearing out. Those socks are no longer available for reorder, but these extremely similar socks were so I ordered them. The quality difference is obvious just by looking at and feeling them. They are more of a faded black/brown than the black pictured or the black that the three year old socks still are. The material is completely different and feels lighter. When wearing them they already feel like they are bunching up in my shoes, which the old ones never did. I do not expect these to last even a year and will not buy them again.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 29, 2026