Pay in installments of $7.95 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 17 - Jul 22
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
305804 c 2z skfTechnische Basisdaten Hersteller: SKF Synonym: 542804 LB3204B 2ZRSTNG LR5204 2Z LR5204KDDU Auendurchmesser: 52 mm ueres Breitenma: 20,600 mm Abdichtung: Abdeckung auf beiden Seiten Ermdungsgrenzbelastung: 0. 4 kN Gewicht: 220 Gramm Grenzdrehzahl: 7 000 r min Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090 Erweiterte technische Daten 2Z Shield Of Pressed Sheet Steel On Both Sides Of The Bearing ueres Breitenmae:(D) mm 52,00 ueres Breitenmae:(B) mm 20,60 C Deviating Or
Technische Basisdaten
| Hersteller: SKF |
| Synonym: 542804 LB3204B-2ZRSTNG LR5204-2Z LR5204KDDU |
| Außendurchmesser: 52 mm |
| Äußeres Breitenmaß: 20,600 mm |
| Abdichtung: Abdeckung auf beiden Seiten |
| Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung: 0.4 kN |
| Gewicht: 220 Gramm |
| Grenzdrehzahl: 7 000 r/min |
| Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090 |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| 2Z Shield Of Pressed Sheet Steel On Both Sides Of The Bearing |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße:(D) mm 52,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße:(B) mm 20,60 |
| C Deviating Or Modified Internal Design With Same Boundary Dimensions |
| Einzelgewicht in (kg): 0.22 |
| Innenmaße:(d) mm 20,00 |
| 20.6 mm Äußeres Breitenmaß |
| 52 mm Außendurchmesser |
| Dynamische Tragzahl: 16.5 kN |
| Gewicht Laufrolle: 0.22kg |
| Maximale dynamische Radialbelastung: max.8.3 kN |
| Maximale statische Radialbelastung: max.12 kN |
| Statische Tragzahl: 9.5 kN |
| min.1 mm Kantenabstand |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.1 ★★★★★
Based on 19 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Well made dividers.
Size: 88''W-4 Panel, Color: Grey
Very durable and stable. Once positioned, they stay upright and firm and don't wobble around. Good materials on both the panels and the frame that supports it. Great for any partitioning needs and a fair price for the quality you receive. Highly recommended.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 28, 2025
★★★★★ 1
No se usó, llego incompleto
Size: 88''W-4 Panel, Color: Beige
Lo devolví, llego incompleto
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 11, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Great quality, very versatile
Size: 6 Panel-132‘’Wide, Color: Beige, Size: 6 Panel-132‘’Wide, Color: Beige
I'm very pleased with this item. It was not complicated to assemble but some items required dexterity and strength. The fabric panels are nice and tight and that's partly why it's a little hard to get that final screw in. I'm very pleased with the legs and the wheels. The metal components are nicely finished and feel substantial and endurable. I can easily fold this so many different ways… I can minimize the number of panels that are seen if desired and it can be straight or accordion. It's very stable which was hugely important to me because I'm fostering many many cats. It's not cheap looking and the light color fabric allows enough light to pass through that it doesn't darken the room substantially. I think the price was very reasonable
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 7, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Affordable. And Good!
Size: 4 Panel-88‘’Wide, Color: Black
We use it everyday. All the pieces came and it was very easy to put up. High quality fabric, and easy to move around.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 21, 2026
★★★★★ 1
Don’t buy
Size: 4 Panel-88‘’Wide, Color: Black
Cheaply made. Had to return. Not durable at all.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 13, 2026