SKU: 58942170688

NWA 18048 Eucrite-pmict Meteorite End Cut, 1530.00g, Main Mass, Mixed Clast Structure

Sale price$2025.00 Regular price$2250.00
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $562.50 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 16 - Aug 21

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

NWA 18048 Eucrite-pmict Meteorite End Cut, 1530.00g, Main Mass, Mixed Clast StructureMain mass from a classified polymict eucrite This 1530. 00g end cut represents the main mass of NWA 18048, a classified polymict eucrite recovered in Northwest Africa in 2024. The specimen preserves the principal recovered stone from this fall, giving it curatorial significance beyond its scientific classification. The end cut format exposes a fresh internal surface showing the mixed clast structure characteristic of polymict eucrites while

Main mass from a classified polymict eucrite

This 1530.00g end cut represents the main mass of NWA 18048, a classified polymict eucrite recovered in Northwest Africa in 2024. The specimen preserves the principal recovered stone from this fall, giving it curatorial significance beyond its scientific classification. The end cut format exposes a fresh internal surface showing the mixed clast structure characteristic of polymict eucrites while maintaining the bulk and physical presence of the original stone.

Polymict eucrites form through impact processes that mix multiple generations of crustal material on a differentiated parent body. This specimen displays that process through varied clast sizes and compositions distributed through a finer-grained matrix. The exposed face shows the textural complexity that separates polymict eucrites from uniform monomict basaltic types, making this specimen both visually engaging and scientifically informative.

Clast distribution and matrix structure

The exposed surface reveals distinct eucritic clasts ranging from millimeter to centimeter scale, set within a darker, finer-grained matrix. These clasts represent fragments of earlier basaltic crust that were disrupted, transported, and reassembled through impact gardening on the parent body surface. The matrix consists of comminuted eucritic material and impact melt products that cemented the clasts together during subsequent heating and lithification.

The variation in clast size, texture, and boundary sharpness across the specimen reflects multiple impact events rather than a single brecciation episode. Some clast boundaries show clean separation while others grade into the surrounding matrix, indicating different thermal and shock histories for individual fragments. This textural heterogeneity makes polymict eucrites valuable for understanding long-term surface evolution on small differentiated bodies.

Formation on a differentiated asteroid

Eucrites belong to the HED achondrite group and formed through basaltic volcanism on a differentiated parent body, widely linked to asteroid 4 Vesta. NASA's Dawn mission confirmed Vesta's basaltic crust and impact history, providing direct evidence for the connection between HED meteorites and this 525-kilometer-diameter asteroid. Polymict eucrites specifically record the reworking of that crust through impact processes over geological time.

The mixed clast assemblage in this specimen represents multiple generations of crustal material, indicating that Vesta's surface underwent repeated impact disruption and reassembly. This process produced a regolith layer composed of brecciated fragments rather than intact bedrock, similar to the lunar highlands but on a body with distinct compositional and thermal history. Understanding these polymict assemblages helps constrain impact flux rates and crustal evolution on differentiated asteroids. Learn more about meteorite types in our Learn About Meteorites guide.

Frequently asked questions

Is this meteorite authenticated? NWA 18048 is classified by the Meteoritical Society as a polymict eucrite. The classification data can be verified through the Meteoritical Bulletin entry: NWA 18048. This specimen includes a certificate of authenticity documenting its classification, weight, and provenance.

What does polymict mean in this classification? Polymict indicates the specimen is a breccia containing multiple clast types rather than a single uniform rock. In eucrites, this reflects impact mixing of different crustal fragments on the parent body surface. The "pmict" designation distinguishes these mixed specimens from monomict eucrites that preserve uniform basaltic textures.

What is included with this specimen? The specimen weighs 1530.00g and includes a certificate of authenticity. No display stand is included with this main mass specimen due to its size and weight.

Why is this called the main mass? The main mass is the largest single piece recovered from a meteorite fall or find. It represents the principal stone and carries added curatorial significance in collections. Main masses are often retained by institutions or serious collectors because they preserve the bulk and physical integrity of the original meteorite.

How should I display a specimen this size? At 1530g, this specimen benefits from a stable horizontal orientation that shows the exposed clast structure. The end cut format provides a natural display face while the opposite surface preserves the original exterior. Custom display solutions work better than standard stands for specimens of this mass.

Significance for HED collectors

Main mass specimens occupy a distinct position in meteorite collecting because they represent the anchor piece from a given recovery. When that main mass is also a classified polymict eucrite from the HED suite, it combines curatorial importance with scientifically complex structure. This specimen serves collectors who prioritize both physical scale and scientific content over small representative fragments.

The 1530g mass makes this piece suitable for advanced collections where display impact and scientific integrity both matter. The exposed clast structure provides ongoing visual interest rather than presenting as a homogeneous surface, and the polymict classification places it within the broader context of Vestan crustal evolution. Explore more HED specimens in our Eucrites collection, or view related material in our HED Meteorites category.

Meteoritical Bulletin entry: NWA 18048 | Classification: Eucrite-pmict | Find, Northwest Africa, 2024

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 58942170688

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.9 ★★★★★
Based on 21 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
H
Verified Purchase
Hunter Blauvelt
Grantham, US
★★★★★ 4
Great portable second screen
Size: 15.6" 1080P
Really convenient for a second screen on the go. The display looks sharp and it’s lightweight enough to carry around easily. Setup is simple, just plug and play. Not super bright, but works well for most uses.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 10, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Michelle
Louisville, US
★★★★★ 5
Exceptional - Better than one twice the price
Size: 15.6" 1080P
I bought a different external monitor a few years ago for twice the price and it was abominable compared to this monitor. This monitor is absolutely perfect. The speakers are definitely tinny like others mentioned, so don't expect to DJ a party with this thing, but for work it's perfect since that means voices are clearer anyways. The sound just isn't as full/rounded with proper bass, but it doesn't even matter because there's also a headphone jack on the monitor, too. USB-C is a total game changer for powering and passing full audio-visual in a single port. The included cables are also a big win since getting a spare data USB-C cable can get pricey and I know the one included is guaranteed to work with this monitor. It was literally plug-and-play with my 2023 16" Macbook Pro. I could go on and on about how every detail of this monitor is perfect, like how the stand is also a screen protector cover and how light and easy it is to carry and how the little grippy feet hold it in place confidently, but my point is THIS is FINALLY the external monitor I've been looking for!!!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 26, 2026
B
Verified Purchase
Brian
Phoenix, US
★★★★★ 5
Great portable display for the price.
Size: 15.6" 1080P
This monitor works very well. I bought because I needed an extra monitor for my iPad on my work desk. But I don’t have an outlet at this desk. The iPad powers the monitor just fine, though it drains the battery pretty quickly. I ended up also buying a 20ft USB-C cable and running that to the nearest outlet to power the monitor and my iPad. I also have a little phone holder standing the display up. The quality is pretty good for the price point. Definitely not my highest quality screen. It's perfect for spreadsheets and the colors are very passable anyway.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 21, 2026
A
Verified Purchase
Andrea Elizondo
Lowell, US
★★★★★ 5
Really good.
Size: 15.6" 1080P
Perfect size. Love the cover that comes with it. Easy storage and portability. Perfect to work on the move. The screen itself looks really good for the price. I connected with the type c and turn on and off as my computer does. Amazing and easy to connect. Doesn't flickers.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 2, 2026
D
Verified Purchase
D. Christensen
Pawtucket, US
★★★★★ 4
Overall great value, for the stated purpose of being a portable monitor
Size: 15.6" 1080P
This is a review of two monitors: MNN Portable Monitor 15.6inch FHD 1080P (no model number listed) M156F01 is marked on the box Arzopa Portable Monitor, 15.6'' 1080P model number: “S1 Table” I ordered the Arzopa monitor first, as kind of an impulse buy. I was going to be traveling and wanted to take my mini Ryzen 9 PC with me, but it had no monitor. I found the Arzopa monitor had good reviews and the price was right so I ordered. Then later I discovered it was a MATTE panel. I’m not sure how I missed that earlier, but I would NOT have ordered it if I knew that it was matte. Matte finishes on monitors are supposed to be easier on eyes as the matte surface supposedly reduces glare. But in my experience, there is a problem with this feature. First, any monitor positioned properly should never have a problem with glare. For example, you don’t position a monitor facing a large window or another source of strong light. If your monitor is positioned correctly, glare should not be a possible problem to be solved. Second, the matte finish on most monitors I have seen tends to greatly distort the picture quality. Imagine you are standing outside at noon, but the area you are in is foggy. The view you have of your surroundings (through a light fog) is similar to the picture quality of any matte finish monitor. At least, in my experience. I was sitting in front of my two large (not portable) monitors, thinking about the mistake I made in ordering a matte finish portable monitor. And I realized…I was so used to using dual monitors that I would really want two monitors for travel, also. I read some reviews of the MNN monitor and someone described it as a GLOSSY panel. Perfect. I decided to order the MNN to use as my “primary” travel monitor with the Arzopa to be used as my “second” monitor for a dual monitor setup while traveling. That led to mistake number 2. They are both matte finish. When I realized this, they had both shipped. And they were delivered very quickly , both arriving on the same day. I decided to give these monitors a try, and I’m glad I did. While they are both described officially as “matte”, the picture qualify is closer to what I would expect from a true “glossy” surface computer monitor. And they both have much more than acceptable image quality. So to compare them: FEATURES: Their features are identical other than their physical controls. For adjusting these monitors, there is a difference between them, and I PREFER one over the other, as far as controls go. Arzopa has multi-function push buttons on the left to adjust settings like brightness/contrast. MNN has push-buttons and a teeny tiny joystick on the right to adjust settings like brightness/contrast. I think this is an odd design decision for a -portable- monitor. The Arzopa controls are both more intuitive and (I believe) probably more sturdy / more likely to be reliable over time. We’ll see if the tiny joystick of the MNN survives a few trips bouncing around in my checked bags. DISPLAY QUALITY I was very pleasantly surprised by the image quality of both of these monitors. I would rate them both a solid 9/10 on image quality. I’ve seen better, but only with OLED panels. Between the two if I had to pick a winner for image quality it would be the MNN. But the difference is so slight. I think they both deserve a “9”. While I can tell they are both matte (and I do not like that) the matte finish of these monitors is not as “foggy” as most matte monitors. It’s not matte enough to detract from the overall image quality, which is great. The factory settings of both monitors had the brightness (black lefel) set too high. Brightness is what controls how “black” black items will appear. If the Brightness is set too high, then something which should be color black will appear to be gray or (worse) even light gray. After I turned down the brightness a bit on both monitors, the black level of both was very satisfying. Speakers: I would never try to use speakers on a portable monitor, so I can’t comment on this. I don’t think the Arzopa even has speakers, but it doesn’t matter, as I would not use those. STAND: They have virtually identical magnetically attached pleather stands that can be used to support the monitors in vertical or horizontal orientation. The magnets on both are pretty weak. However, it should be adequate for use on a solid desk or table. You might not be happy on an airplane if you hit turbulence at all. Summary and suggestion for improvement: I would give both of these a 4-star rating on the Amazon scale. To earn a 5-star rating I would suggest: 1) Replace the magnetic stand with something that attaches to the monitor more firmly. 2) Include a USB-C cable with a right-angle connector on one end. For dual monitor use, these both have cables sticking out the left side. If you want to set them side by side, you need to keep them about 2” apart, because the cables interfere with setting them close together, like you want to. The most obvious solution would be a right-angle USB-C cable. I have ordered one. But it would cost nothing for Arzopa and MNN to include this. 3) Make the above changes without increasing the price. If you could do that, I would rate these monitors a solid 5/5. There are better monitors for sale. But for the stated purpose and price? These are close to what I would want. Very close. FINAL THOUGHT: (Which One Should I Buy?) There are many portable monitors available with plenty of options in the same relative price range. The two I am reviewing here are a couple of the most highly rated. If you are trying to choose between these two specific monitors, I would recommend you buy the Arzopa. While the MNN has slightly better image quality, they both have really good image quality. I think the design of the Arzopa is just a bit more appropriate for the stated purpose of being portable. If you are leaning toward the MNN however, I would not discourage you from buying it. If you’ve narrowed down your decision to these two specific monitors, I don’t think you can possibly choose “wrong” if you buy only one of them. They both exceeded my expectations.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 16, 2025

recommand products