SKU: 71624606953

Ford Racing 8.8 Inch 3.73 Ring Gear and Pinion

Sale price$130.50 Regular price$145.00
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $36.25 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 16 - Aug 21

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Ford Racing 8.8 Inch 3.73 Ring Gear and PinionFord Racing ring and pinion sets are engineered, manufactured, and tested for maximum performance. These ring and pinion sets are finished in a black oxide coating for corrosion resistance, and are available in many different ratios to fit a variety of Ford differentials. ** Note: 3. 15 Ratio Differential not compatible with 3 31, 3. 55, 3. 73 and 4. 09 ratio gears. Use differential M 4204 MT or M 4204 M. * This part is designed and intended for

Ford Racing ring and pinion sets are engineered, manufactured, and tested for maximum performance. These ring and pinion sets are finished in a black oxide coating for corrosion resistance, and are available in many different ratios to fit a variety of Ford differentials. ** Note: 3.15 Ratio Differential not compatible with 3/31, 3.55, 3.73 and 4.09 ratio gears. Use differential M-4204-MT or M-4204-M. * This part is designed and intended for competition use only. It should not be installed on a vehicle that is driven on public roads and highways. Installation of this art on a vehicle driven on public roads and highways is likely to violate U.S. and Canadian laws and regulations relating to motor vehicle emissions.
Installation Instructions


This Part Fits:

Year Make Model Submodel
1990-1997 Ford Aerostar Base
1990-1994 Ford Aerostar Eddie Bauer
1990-1994 Ford Aerostar XL
1990-1994 Ford Aerostar XL Plus
1991-1994 Ford Aerostar XL Sport
1990-1997 Ford Aerostar XLT
1990-1997 Ford Aerostar XLT Plus
1991-1997 Ford Aerostar XLT Sport
1983-1993 Ford Bronco Custom
1985-1996 Ford Bronco Eddie Bauer
1990-1996 Ford Bronco XL
1983 Ford Bronco XLS
1984-1992,1994-1996 Ford Bronco XLT
1983,1993 Ford Bronco XLT Lariat
1992 Ford Bronco XLT Nite
1995-1996 Ford Bronco XLT Sport
1992-2008,2010-2011 Ford Crown Victoria Base
2006-2009 Ford Crown Victoria Fleet
2002-2009 Ford Crown Victoria LWB
1992-2011 Ford Crown Victoria LX
2004-2006 Ford Crown Victoria LX Sport
1993-2011 Ford Crown Victoria Police Interceptor
1992-2005 Ford Crown Victoria S
2005 Ford Crown Victoria Special Edition
1992 Ford Crown Victoria Touring Sedan
2003-2010 Ford E-150 Base
2006-2007 Ford E-150 Chateau
2006-2010 Ford E-150 XL
2006-2010 Ford E-150 XLT
2003-2005 Ford E-150 Club Wagon Chateau
2003-2005 Ford E-150 Club Wagon XL
2003-2005 Ford E-150 Club Wagon XLT
1984-1986,1992-2002 Ford E-150 Econoline Base
1983,1987-1991 Ford E-150 Econoline Custom
1983-2000 Ford E-150 Econoline XL
1984-1986 Ford E-150 Econoline Club Wagon Base
1992-2002 Ford E-150 Econoline Club Wagon Chateau
1983,1987-2000 Ford E-150 Econoline Club Wagon Custom
1983-1991,2001-2002 Ford E-150 Econoline Club Wagon XL
1984-2002 Ford E-150 Econoline Club Wagon XLT
1985 Ford E-250 Econoline Base
1989 Ford E-250 Econoline Custom
1985,1989 Ford E-250 Econoline XL
1997-2004 Ford Expedition Eddie Bauer
2004 Ford Expedition NBX
2004 Ford Expedition XLS
1997-2004 Ford Expedition XLT
2004 Ford Expedition XLT Sport
1991-2001 Ford Explorer Eddie Bauer
1995 Ford Explorer Expedition
1993-2001 Ford Explorer Limited
2000-2001 Ford Explorer Postal
1991-2000 Ford Explorer Sport
1991-1999 Ford Explorer XL
2000-2001 Ford Explorer XL Fleet
1999-2001 Ford Explorer XLS
1991-2001 Ford Explorer XLT
2001 Ford Explorer Sport Base
2005 Ford Explorer Sport Trac Adrenalin
2001 Ford Explorer Sport Trac Base
2007-2010 Ford Explorer Sport Trac Limited
2002 Ford Explorer Sport Trac XL
2003-2005 Ford Explorer Sport Trac XLS
2003-2005,2007-2010 Ford Explorer Sport Trac XLT
1983-1986,1997-2000 Ford F-150 Base
1987-1992 Ford F-150 Custom
1995-1996 Ford F-150 Eddie Bauer
2008,2010 Ford F-150 FX2
2001-2003 Ford F-150 King Ranch
1997-2003 Ford F-150 Lariat
1993-1995 Ford F-150 Lightning
1995-1996 Ford F-150 Special
2004-2011 Ford F-150 STX
2008 Ford F-150 THE 60TH ANNIVERSARY EDITION
1983-2011 Ford F-150 XL
1983 Ford F-150 XLS
1983-1984,1993-2011 Ford F-150 XLT
1985-1992 Ford F-150 XLT Lariat
2011-2014 Ford Mustang Base
2012-2013 Ford Mustang Boss 302
2008-2009 Ford Mustang Bullitt
2005-2014 Ford Mustang GT
2007-2008 Ford Mustang Shelby GT
2007-2014 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500
2008-2009 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500KR
1990-1992 Ford Ranger Custom
2001-2005 Ford Ranger Edge
2005-2009 Ford Ranger FX4
1990-1992 Ford Ranger S
1990 Ford Ranger S Plus
1993-1998 Ford Ranger Splash
1991-1993,1997,2006-2011 Ford Ranger Sport
1990-1997,2005-2007 Ford Ranger STX
2004 Ford Ranger Tremor
1993-2011 Ford Ranger XL
1995 Ford Ranger XL Sport
1990-2011 Ford Ranger XLT
1987-1988 Ford Thunderbird Turbo
1996 Lincoln Town Car Anniversary
1983-1999 Lincoln Town Car Base
1983-2003 Lincoln Town Car Cartier
2001-2003 Lincoln Town Car Cartier L
1990-1995 Lincoln Town Car Cypress
2006-2007 Lincoln Town Car Designer Series
1990-2010 Lincoln Town Car Executive
2001-2011 Lincoln Town Car Executive L
2003 Lincoln Town Car Executive Protection Series
1993 Lincoln Town Car Jack Nicklaus
2004-2006 Lincoln Town Car Protection Series
1983-2007 Lincoln Town Car Signature
2005-2011 Lincoln Town Car Signature L
2005-2011 Lincoln Town Car Signature Limited
1989 Lincoln Town Car Signature SE
1990-1995,1997 Lincoln Town Car Touring Edition
1994 Lincoln Town Car Tournament Edition
2004 Lincoln Town Car Ultimate
2004 Lincoln Town Car Ultimate L
1986 Mercury Capri 5.0
1983-1986 Mercury Cougar Base
1983-1988,1991-1992 Mercury Cougar LS
1987-1988,1991-1997 Mercury Cougar XR-7
1983-1986 Mercury Grand Marquis Base
1983-1986 Mercury Grand Marquis Colony Park
1987-2008 Mercury Grand Marquis GS
2005 Mercury Grand Marquis GSL
2005 Mercury Grand Marquis Limited Edition
1983-2011 Mercury Grand Marquis LS
2003 Mercury Grand Marquis LSE
2005 Mercury Grand Marquis Ultimate Edition
1998-2004,2007-2010 Mercury Mountaineer Base
2005-2006 Mercury Mountaineer Convenience
2005-2006 Mercury Mountaineer Luxury
2004-2010 Mercury Mountaineer Premier
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 71624606953

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.3 ★★★★★
Based on 27 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
W
Verified Purchase
William M. Victor
West Palm Beach, US
★★★★★ 4
Thoughtful book on the purpose of the Creation accounts
Format: Paperback
This book provides a very good introduction into how the Old Testament (Hebrew Bible) was most likely formed. It takes very seriously the environment that may have shaped the Pentateuch. It also provides a good primer into how Paul read the Hebrew Bible: through the lens of the death and resurrection of Jesus. If the reader of the Bible understands the purpose behind the creation narratives then there appears to be less conflict with scientific explanations for the origins of the universe and even humanity. I was expecting this book to do something that Enns never claims he was setting out to do, that is give an alternative understanding of the origins of sin and death while taking Paul's account in Romans 5 seriously. Enns claims that Paul interpreted the Adam story in a way that he interpreted other accounts of the Hebrew Bible, through a Christological lens but with little regard to historical context. To Enns, Paul was a man of his time and just because Paul, a man uninformed by scientific explanations of the universe, understood Adam as a historical person doesn't mean those of us who are informed need to see it the same way. Enns values Paul's Christocentric lens on the Hebrew Bible, but comes just short of calling Paul wrong on his understanding of the origin of sin and death. If you are working through the issue of integration/synthesizing scientific thoughts on the origins of the universe and humanity (as well as trying to come to grips with the purpose of the Creation accounts in Genesis) this book will serve you well. If you are expecting Enns to provide that integration/synthesis for you, you will be disappointed.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 3, 2012
M
Verified Purchase
Mark A. Chenoweth
Birmingham, US
★★★★★ 5
Enns' view of Adam will eventually dominate in the Evangelical academy
Format: Paperback
For years and years on end, I have been fascinated with trying to make Adam and Eve line up with evolution. I took a bunch of positions that I knew were ad-hoc but I didn't know what else to do at the time. One thing I couldn't figure out was why Genesis 1-3 seemed to be completely symbolic, yet Paul seemed to interpret it so literally. I read through Genesis 1-3 again and again and again. I picked up commentary after commentary. But the commentaries I read (other than Claus Westermann's-which is fantastic)seemed to make arbitrary jumps between interpreting the Adam story literally and symbolically. The attempts to literally interpret the story seemed to stem from a desire to stay faithful to Paul's reading of the story rather than from a desire to be faithful to the Genesis text. But shouldn't how Paul interprets the story be the final word on Adam for Christians? This is what The Evolution of Adam deals with. Paul's interpretation of the story in Romans and 1 Corinthians seemed to be a strange re-reading of the story...one that is overly literal. A talking snake? God walking in the garden? Every good Christian knows God doesn't have a body. So why in the world did Paul read this story so literally? It's this that Enns tries to answer. He shows us that Paul didn't intend to give us a historical critical exegesis of Genesis. Maybe Paul thought Adam was a literal person, maybe he didn't. This is beside the point. Enns shows that Paul was doing some pastoral reshaping of the Adam story along the lines of 2nd Temple Judaism to highlight the significance of Christ's death and resurrection. According to Enns' the "authorial intent" of Genesis 2 and 3 was of very little significance to Paul. Even if Paul knew (and there's good reason to believe he did) that Genesis doesn't indicate that Adam's sin has a universal effect on all humanity, he probably would have used the Adam story in the exact same way. Why? Because it was the best way to explain how Christ put Jews and Gentiles on an "equal footing." For Paul, Christ came first. Anything that could help explain the significance of Christ, even if that meant reshaping OT testament passages from their original "authorial intent," was fair game for Paul. And as Enns shows, it was also fair game for Paul's contemporaries. As Christians, we know we are sinners because we have a savior, not because Adam sinned. In the words of world-renowned Patristics professor and Eastern Orthodox scholar, John Behr, "We should not begin with a claim to know ourselves as sinful and then find a savior who corresponds to what we think our problems are...Christ provides the diagnosis of our condition and simultaneously provides the remedy." Enns' suggestions for the evolution debate are controversial among evangelicals, although they seem to be accepted by many Eastern Orthodox and Catholic academics today. Evangelicalism is a bit behind. Enns' book will provide for much discussion and will inflame reformed Evangenical fundamentalists like Albert Mohler. But his suggestions will ultimately be accepted by the majority of evangelical theologians in the next 100 or so years. I'm fairly sure of this. Although I'm Eastern Orthodox, Peter Enns' book is thoroughly orthodox, excellently argued, pastorally sensitive and ultimately game-changing for the Evangelical world. And although it seems many Orthodox are already talking Enns' game, to my knowledge, no one has written a book on the subject that actually tackles all the sticky exegetical issues. So Enns' book transcends the Protestant/Catholic/Orthodox divide. One thing Enns did leave out is what to do with the genealogies in scripture that mention Adam. If you are interested in a discussion of these, check out Daniel Harlow's article online entitled "After Adam: Reading Genesis in an Age of Evolutionary Science."
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 24, 2012
A
Verified Purchase
AlbMonk
Los Angeles, US
★★★★★ 5
Opened My Eyes to a New View
Format: Kindle
Excellent book. Entirely changed the way that I have looked at the origins debate. I have been a lifelong literal creationist for most of my Christian life. But, in recent years I have begun to question this view and look a bit closer at how evolution could in fact be reconciled with the creation story. And, this book has most certainly helped with this journey. "The Evolution of Adam" is broken up into two major parts with each part broken up into several more detailed subsets: 1) Genesis: An Ancient Story of Israelite Self-definition; 2) Understanding Paul's Adam. It is from these two parts where Enns believes he can establish an understanding about the Genesis story, Adam, and where evolution could fit into the story. Using textual criticism, Enns makes numerous conclusions based on both biblical and extra-biblical resources. Here are just a few that I have observed: 1) The Genesis account is NOT a book about origins, but a wisdom book about Israel's identity as a chosen people. Never did the Jewish people claim or believe Genesis was about the origins of the world and humanity. 2) Enns also surmises that Genesis was likely written post-exilic by the prophet Ezra at a time when Israel had lost its identity in Babylonian captivity and were seeking a renewed national identity that had been lost. 3) The Genesis creation story closely resembles numerous other creation stories of Israel's neighboring cultures (i.e. Atrahasis, Enuma Elish, Gilgamesh). 4) That Adam was a proto-type of Israel (i.e. loved by God, disobeys Gods command, and suffers the consequences, exiled from the garden/Babylon). 5) That Paul's Adam was explained in the context of 1st century Judaism and was using Adam as a mere metaphor and example of spiritual death for both Jews and gentile alike. 6) Adam could have possibly been the first homo-sapien that became aware of his spiritual nature, but hominids could have existed prior to Adam. 7) Nowhere in the Old Testament and Jewish history was Adam known to be the conduit for which sin became an inherited nature passed on to all of mankind. Where I think this book is lacking is where evolution comes into play. Enns spends most of his time breaking down and dissecting the creation story, but spends very little time building up the evolution process and how it fits in. Nevertheless, we cannot dismiss the science of evolution at the expense of taking the creation/Adam account literally. There is wiggle room in these two ideologies to allow for both God's divine creation and scientific evolution. Great book. Must be read with an open mind. If you hold firmly to creationism and believe it to be the ONLY way, then this book is likely not for you. But, if you are open to the possibility that Genesis is not a scientific book about human origins, then you may find this to be quite good. Enns speaks in such a way that this book is not too academic and easy enough for the average layman to understand. it is highly recommended.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 17, 2014
W
Verified Purchase
West Virginia Born
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 5
Very insightful
Format: Paperback
I am a materialistic atheist and I liked this book a lot. Perhaps that is why Peter Enns lost his teaching position! I certainly would not agree with Enns on his religious views but I found his scholarship & willingness to stray from closed-minded literalism refreshing. I learned quite a bit about Paul and his modus operandi in dealing with OT passages. I was presented a way of thinking about Genesis that transcended "it's just a metaphor" or "its just an ancient myth". Basically, my take home messages were 1) the Bible was compiled in its final form during exilic/post-exilic times though it contains some much older material 2) the OT was written as a means of self-definition & self-explanation for the Jewish people after the trauma of exile 3) the Bible is "incarnational", meaning both divine & human (those who demand it be free of its chronological & cultural milieu are being unreasonable) 4) God can "inspire" by stooping to our level & it's unwise to tell God what he can & can't do in terms of revelation 5) the Bible has no intent to be scientific and historical in early Genesis 6) Paul is a bigger obstacle to accepting evolution to many Christians than Genesis 7) by tying Adam & Eve to original sin & origin of death, Paul re-shapes/reinterprets the story in a way that seems foreign to OT writers 8) rejecting evolution means rejecting Pauline theology for many and 9) Paul, who also re-writes OT meaning in Abraham (faith vrs law; "seed(s)", uses Adam to put Jew and gentile on equal footing in needing grace/Christ's sacrifice/obedience for salvation. Christ, as second Adam, undoes damage of first Adam for ALL (Jew & gentile) willing to accept the gift of grace. Paul uses midrash/pesher arguments for his Christological interpretations with "creative engagement" of OT texts. Again, while Enns and I probably have very little common ground for agreement, I appreciated the book & was struck by this passage at the end: "...the light of science does not shine with equal brightness in every corner. There is mystery. There is transcendence. By faith I believe that the Christian story has deep access to a reality that materialism cannot provide and cannot be expected to know. That is a confession of faith, I readily admit, but when it comes to accessing ultimate reality, we are all in the same boat, materialistic atheists included: at some point we must trust in something or someone beyond logic and evidence, even if it is to declare that there is nothing beyond what we see." While I wouldn't agree totally with that statement, it strikes me as very honest, sincere & open-minded. Good book whether you agree or disagree with it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 13, 2012
K
Verified Purchase
Kathy Sund prescher
Belleville, US
★★★★★ 4
For those that really Want to know!
Format: Paperback
I chose this rating because of the excellence of content. This author has chosen to give us, those who are truly seeking answers to difficult questions, the possibilities in finding closure or agreement with the very difficult task of merging Science, and all it entails, with our faith. I always feel pulled both ways with ther being no logical way to blend the two, I then felt I must have to give up one for the other but could not do so. This book has helped me begin the journey of understanding what I've always known to be true but could not put together. They do work. There are logical explanations for the seeming opposites of scripture and science. It's a Very important read. For years I have wished C.S. Lewis was still alive. He i have turned to for so many things. But with so many advances since his death, I have needed new thoughts as like minded as he . There are more Lewises out there!!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 24, 2013

recommand products