SKU: 8019119057

Gluck, Christoph Willibald: Four Dances from Don Juan (AE169)

Sale price$25.20 Regular price$28.00
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $7.00 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 6 - Aug 11

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Gluck, Christoph Willibald: Four Dances from Don Juan (AE169)Description Gluck, Christoph Willibald (1714 1787) Product Code: AE169 Description: Four Dances from Don Juan Edited by: Cliff Eisen Year of Publication: 1997 Instrumentation: 2ob 2cor fag 2vn va b Binding: Score: Spiral Parts: Unbound Duration: Various ISBN: 1 877171 69 7 Details Leopold Mozart also copied our four dances from Gluck's ballet Don Juan (Vienna, 1761). His autograph score, now in the Bayerische Staatsbibliothek,Munich (Mus. mss. 7859),

Description

Gluck, Christoph Willibald (1714-1787)

Product Code: AE169
Description: Four Dances from Don Juan
Edited by: Cliff Eisen
Year of Publication: 1997
Instrumentation: 2ob 2cor fag 2vn va b
Binding: Score: Spiral / Parts: Unbound
Duration: Various
ISBN: 1-877171-69-7

Details

Leopold Mozart also copied our four dances from Gluck's ballet Don Juan (Vienna, 1761). His autograph score, now in the Bayerische Staatsbibliothek,Munich (Mus.mss. 7859), is written on a single bifolium, with the dances in the following order: No.18 (fo. 1 r, staves 1-5 and 7- 11); No.1 (fo. 1 v, staves 1-4 and 5-8); No.2 (from fo. 1v, the middle of staves 1-6, to fo. 2r, the middle of staves 1-6); and No.21 (from fo. 2r, the middle of staves 1-6, to fo. 2v, the middle of staves 1-6). There is no contemporary wrapper, nor any attribution on the score; a notation by Aloys Fuchs on a later wrapper attests to Leopold Mozart's handwriting. The dating of the manuscript is uncertain. Because the paper is of local Salzburg manufacture, it is unlikely to have been copied in Vienna when the Mozarts visited there in 1762 (although it is possible that Leopold took a stock of Salzburg paper with him to the Imperial capital. Atypically, the paper is hand-ruled with twelve staves per side). And a date of 1779-1780, when Don Juan was performed in Salzburg by the travelling troupe of Johann Böhm, is probably too late: this particular paper-type was used in Salzburg only until early 1772. The most probable date of copying is therefore sometime during the 1760s. Leopold Mozart's source for the dances is unknown. Although the score hews closely to Gluck's original, it nevertheless includes some changes, suggesting it was copied from a secondary or tertiary source. At measure 12 of No.18, for example, Leopold Mozart's autograph has the double stop (sounding) b'/e', where Gluck has a unison b'; in the same dance, at measure 25, Gluck has the dynamic piano in all the parts, while Leopold Mozart writes mez. for. for the first and second violins only. Similarly, in No.21, Leopold writes Maestoso over the first violin part; Gluck has Grazioso. And at measures 4 and 8 of the first violin part, Leopold has two quarter-notes for the first violin, which conflicts with the 8th notes and 8th-rests in the second violin, violas and basses. There also appears to be an intentional change in texture for the string basses at measure 9 (see below). Throughout this edition, editorial slurs are dotted and editorial dynamics are given in square brackets; added text, including tempo and character indications, is given in italics. Slurs have not been added automatically to connect grace notes and main notes; although Leopold Mozart prescribed the universal performance of such slurs (Versuch einer gründlichen Violinschule [Augsburg, 1756], pp.193-4), even the examples in his book regularly dispense with them. It is not out of the question that the notation of such a slur is significant, and I have accordingly reproduced the text as it stands in the source. Several details of Leopold Mozart's score are either unclear or ambiguous, especially when compared to Gluck's original. Performers may wish to reconsider the following details. No.18 Gluck's tempo indication is Allegro giustoso; Leopold Mozart's is Allegro gustoso. In Leopold Mozart's score, slurs are consistently omitted in the first violin, contrasting with the slurred 8ths in the second violin and viola. In Gluck's original, successive 8th-notes in the first violin are slurred. No. 1 M.7: In the Gluck, the first four 8ths in the first violin are articulated with a stroke on the first note, and a slur connecting the next three notes, contrary to the second violins; in Leopold Mozart's score the slurring is identical in both parts: two slurs of two notes each. Similarly, in the Gluck, the last two 8ths for violin 1 and 2 are given with strokes; Leopold Mozart has slurs. No.2 Gluck's original includes parts for oboes that double the first violins throughout; these are omitted in Leopold Mozart's score. No.21 Leopold Mozart gives no tempo or characterization designation; Grazioso has been taken over from Gluck's original. Throughout, the figure including a quarter note followed by four 8th notes is invariably given in Leopold Mozart's score without articulation. The original sensibly articulates the four 8th notes with dots under a slur (see vn.1: mm. 1 , 5, 7, 17, 23, 25, 35, 37, 39, 41; vn.2:mm. 2, 6, 18, 21, 23, 36, 40; va: mm. 2, 6, 18, 22, 29, 36, 40; basso: mm. 2, 6, 18, 36, 40; horns: 1 , 5, 17, 25, 29, 35, 39). The final 8th of m.26 in the second violins, viola and basso, which involves a pitch change, is an exception: here Leopold Mozart has included articulation for the second violin, which has been added editorially to the viola and basso parts. Mm.9 and 31, string basses: the original includes a direction to play pizzicato, similar to the first and second violins; Leopold Mozart's score omits the pizzicato for the string basses at m.9. Possibly the change is intentional: Mozart at first wrote pizzicato for the string basses but subsequently crossed it out. On the other hand, pizzicato is indicated at m.31. Accordingly, the passages can be standardized or left to stand as in the autograph, presenting subtle textural differences. Mm.35-42: Mozart's score sends at m.34 with the direction D:C: [Da Capo], without indicating earlier on or where the dance is to end. Similar to Gluck's original, I have appended measures 1-8 with the difference, however, that the final measure of the piece has not been changed to half-notes. Cliff Eisen

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 8019119057

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 10 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
N
Verified Purchase
Nia
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 3
3.5 stars
Size: Pack of 25, Set name: Classic
These bracelets work but with caveats. I got them because sometimes I want to take quick walks outside, but don't want to put on sticky big spray and have to shower 2x a day because of the spray. Enter these bracelets. 1st caveat: they fairly quickly decrease in efficacy, which makes me feel guilty for creating so much non compostable/recyclable waste relatively quickly. I have a neighbor with a swampy pool that causes a bunch of mosquitos in the neighborhood in the summer. Without the bracelets, I got 14 bites when going outside for 1 hour. With the bracelets (1st wear and one per limb), I got none. 2nd caveat: I have found that I need 1 bracelet per limb in order to avoid bites. For a nighttime Joshua tree stargazing outing with a friend, we each only put one on and both got bit up like crazy. Later, I gave the bracelets another chance. I put one on each elbow and one on each knee. Wore them and then put them back in the pouches for later use. No bites. Used them a 2nd and 3rd time with no bites, but got 4 bites today with the 4th use, which indicates they're at their effective end of life at around 3 or 4 wears. Overall, they work if you make sure you have a little citronella bubble around you by putting one on each limb, but they generate a relatively large amount of waste for the amount of protection they provide, and the protection itself can be spotty. If your only goal is to not use chemical spray on your skin, these bracelets meet it. If your goal is solely to not get bit, spray might be a better choice.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 15, 2024
J
Verified Purchase
J.W.
Los Angeles, US
★★★★★ 5
Great gift for keeping the mosquitoes away!
Size: Pack of 10, Set name: Classic
My significant other loves to take hikes in the woods and for now, it is bug free, but that won't last long here in Minnesota! I gave him these insect repellent bracelets before and he really appreciated them. He doesn't like spraying bug repellant on himself or his clothing, so these bracelets are the ticket for him! I tucked them in a gift bag along with some trail mix for his next hiking adventure. He loved them! You will, too!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 24, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Maria Marquez
Carnegie, US
★★★★★ 4
Help repellent the mosquito but not that well
Size: Pack of 10, Set name: Classic
They dont work too well i still got bit but not as much
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 11, 2026
S
Verified Purchase
suesaner
Charlottesville, US
★★★★★ 5
a great product at the best price.
Size: 100 Count (Pack of 3), Set name: Classic
nice feel, just the right size for doing nails or using toners on the face. absorbant but not flimsy so the product stays in the pad. cant beat the price, either...
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 10, 2026
F
Verified Purchase
F. Hudson
Natrona Heights, US
★★★★★ 5
Perfect cotton rounds
Size: 100 Count (Pack of 3), Set name: Classic
Love these!. They are soft but sturdy. Not going to disintegrate in your hands. No fuzzies. Perfect for makeup removal, nail polish removal, touch ups etc.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 10, 2026

recommand products